LEADER 03106nam  2200601Ia 450 
001 9910220153103321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-8330-4944-5
035   $a(CKB)2670000000014537
035   $a(EBL)510392
035   $a(OCoLC)593354959
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000336579
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11286687
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000336579
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10282085
035   $a(PQKB)11407824
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL510392
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10375771
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC510392
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000014537
100   $a20091209d2009      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 02$aA delicate balance $eportfolio analysis and management for intelligence information dissemination programs /$fEric Landree ... [et al.]
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aSanta Monica, CA $cRAND$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (65 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-8330-4909-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; CHAPTER ONE - Introduction: The Basics of Portfolio Management; Applications of Portfolio Management for the National Security Agency Information Sharing Services Division; Organization of This Monograph; CHAPTER TWO - The RAND PortMan Method; Expected Value; Metrics; Value and Risk Estimation; Portfolio Analysis; CHAPTER THREE - PortMan Evaluation of the NSA ISS Portfolio; ISS Project Descriptions; Questions for Evaluating Value and Risk Metrics; Consensus Analysis
327   $aAnalysis of Value, Risk, and Portfolio BalanceCost Analysis; Research and Development Que; CHAPTER FOUR - Conclusions; APPENDIX A - Project Descriptions; APPENDIX B - Research and Development Questions; APPENDIX C - Operations and Maintenance Questions; APPENDIX D - Delphi Exercise Results by Project and Question; Bibliography
330   $aThis description of the application of the RAND Corporation's PortMan portfolio analysis and management method and Delphi consensus-building method for the National Security Agency (NSA) Information Sharing Services (ISS) division highlights how these methods enable the data-driven analysis of project portfolios and the allocation of research and development (R&D) and operations and maintenance (O&M) resources according to value, risk, and cost.
606   $aIntelligence service$zUnited States
606   $aIntelligence service$zUnited States$xManagement
606   $aProject management
606   $aProgram budgeting
615  0$aIntelligence service
615  0$aIntelligence service$xManagement.
615  0$aProject management.
615  0$aProgram budgeting.
676   $a353.1/72380973
701   $aLandree$b Eric$0913866
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910220153103321
996   $aA delicate balance$92047540
997   $aUNINA