LEADER 05365nam 2200685 450 001 9910220145903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8330-8772-X 010 $a0-8330-8774-6 035 $a(CKB)3710000000320933 035 $a(EBL)1899334 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001401783 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12529134 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001401783 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11350474 035 $a(PQKB)10807108 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16114586 035 $a(PQKB)22509970 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1899334 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11000807 035 $a(OCoLC)891324560 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1899334 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000320933 100 $a20150117h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aDeveloping a research strategy for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense $estatus of current research, prioritizing areas of need, and recommendations for moving forward /$fRajeev Ramchand [and six others] 210 1$aSanta Monica, California :$cRAND Corporation,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (359 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8330-8771-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Boxes; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; CHAPTER ONE: Introduction; Background; Study Purpose; Approach; Organization of This Report; CHAPTER TWO: Current Suicide Prevention Research in the United States That Is Directly Relevant to Military Personnel; Methods; Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria; Identifying Studies for Abstraction; Data Abstraction; Results; Studies Identified, Funders, and Funding; Funding, by NAASP Category; Funding, by MOMRP Category; Conclusion 327 $aCHAPTER THREE: Prioritizing Research Needs in the U.S. Department of Defense Background; Methods; Creating Aspirational Goals; Selection of Stakeholder Participants; Implementation of the DoD Stakeholder Elicitation Process; Implementing the RAND Expert Lens Process; Analysis; Results; Participant Response; Ranking Across the Five Domains; Additional Elicitation from RAND Experts; Conclusion; CHAPTER FOUR: Preliminary Gap Analysis; Methods; Results; Perceived Importance; Effectiveness; Cultural Acceptability; Cost; Learning Potential; Conclusion 327 $aCHAPTER FIVE: Modeling DoD's Suicide Prevention Research Priorities Background; Methods; Model Parameters; Parameterization of the Model; Analysis; Results; Suicides Prevented per Cost; Suicides Prevented per Cost Relative to Overall Importance; Benefit-Cost Index Relative to Cultural Acceptability; Benefit-Cost Index Relative to Learning Value; Funding and Study Allocation Relative to the Benefit-Cost Index; Sensitivity Analysis; Conclusion; CHAPTER SIX: Translating Research into Practice; Literature Review Strategy; A Note on Terminology; The Ten Components; 1. Evidence of an Identified Need 327 $a2. Evidence of Research Quality 3. Evidence of Effectiveness; 4. Leadership Buy-In and Support from Key Stakeholders; 5. Funding or Other Institutional Support; 6. Collaboration with Credible Sponsors; 7. Provision of Incentives or Development of Policies; 8. Peer Network Supportive of Adoption; 9. Dissemination Materials; 10. Expectation of a Cultural Shift; Conclusion; CHAPTER SEVEN: Recommendations for a Research Strategy; Overarching Recommendation; Priorities for Research Funding; Processes to Enhance and More Efficiently Allocate Research Funding 327 $aProcesses to Close the Research-to-Practice Gap Conclusion; APPENDIXES; A. Ongoing Studies of Relevance to Suicide Prevention Among Military Personnel; B. Alternative Allocation Analysis; C. Statistical Procedure for Extracting Rankings from the RAND Expert Lens Panel; D. Feedback from DoD Stakeholders About the RAND ExpertLens Process; E. Sensitivity Analysis of the Benefit-Cost Index Rankings; F. Research Domains and Approaches for Assessing Research Quality; References 330 $aTo support U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) efforts to create a unified, comprehensive strategic plan for suicide prevention research, a RAND study cataloged studies funded by DoD and other entities, examined whether current research maps to DoD's strategic research needs, and provided recommendations to encourage better alignment and narrow the research-practice gap when it comes to disseminating findings to programs serving military personnel. 606 $aPsychology, Military 606 $aSuicide$xPrevention$xResearch 606 $aSuicide$xPrevention$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xMental health services 615 0$aPsychology, Military. 615 0$aSuicide$xPrevention$xResearch. 615 0$aSuicide$xPrevention$xGovernment policy 676 $a355.6/1 700 $aRamchand$b Rajeev$01034200 702 $aRamchand$b Rajeev 712 02$aRand Corporation. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220145903321 996 $aDeveloping a research strategy for suicide prevention in the Department of Defense$92883847 997 $aUNINA