LEADER 03474oam  2200553zu 450 
001 9910220120303321
005 20220908160420.0
010   $a0-8330-8349-X
035   $a(CKB)3360000000476959
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001048553
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12459899
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001048553
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10997959
035   $a(PQKB)10227975
035   $a(oapen)doab115216
035   $a(EXLCZ)993360000000476959
100   $a20160829d2012      uh         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn|---annan
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aImproving Air Force depot programming by linking resources to capabilities /$fDon Snyder [et al.]
210   $cRAND Corporation$d2012
210 31$aSanta Monica, CA :$cRand ;$d2012
215   $a1 online resource (xix, 86 pages) $cillustrations
225 1 $aTechnical report (Rand Corporation)
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 1 $a0-8330-5967-X 
327   $aIntroduction Depot purchased equipment maintenance Metrics for assessing capabilities and risks in depot purchased equipment maintenance Enterprise prioritization in depot purchased equipment maintenance funding A prototype model for assessing capabilities and risks in depot purchased equipment maintenance programming Software maintenance challenges for capabilities-based programming Policy options and conclusions Appendix A. Aircraft possession purpose codes Appendix B. Decision support system description Appendix C. Software Deferrals Appendix D. The software requirements and execution process
330   $aOne of the more challenging goals in programming is to link Air Force budget program element investments to operationally relevant capability metrics, then to use these metrics to assess any risk incurred by a proposed program objective memorandum (POM). Previous RAND Project AIR FORCE work developed a set of metrics and framework of analysis for capabilities-based programming and assessment of risks of expeditionary combat support. Because of the success of that work, the RAND Corporation was asked to apply and to extend (as needed) this capabilities based approach to the depot maintenance business areas, specifically focusing on depot purchased equipment maintenance (DPEM) as a first step, and to do so with a methodology that is broadly applicable. DPEM comprises numerous depot-level maintenance and inspection activities on capital assets, as well as storage and other supporting activities that span numerous program elements, budget programs, and appropriations. It funds the bulk of the work done at the Air Force depots that does not involve the repair of spares or the work on modification programs. This report presents an analysis of how to better program for DPEM.
606   $aMilitary engineering$2bicssc
606   $aMilitary history$2bicssc
606   $aScience: general issues$2bicssc
610   $aGeneral Science
610   $aHistory
610   $aTechnology
615  7$aMilitary engineering
615  7$aMilitary history
615  7$aScience: general issues
676   $a358.4/18
702   $aSnyder$b Don$f1962-
712 02$aProject Air Force (U.S.)
712 02$aRand Corporation.
801  0$bPQKB
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910220120303321
996   $aImproving Air Force depot programming by linking resources to capabilities$92877950
997   $aUNINA