LEADER 01712nam a2200373 i 4500 001 991001641289707536 008 020527m19992002enka b 001 0 eng 020 $a0521413621 (v. 1) 020 $a0521623499 (v. 2) 035 $ab1217628x-39ule_inst 040 $aDip.to Matematica$beng 082 0 $a512.2$221 084 $aAMS 20D08 084 $aLC QA177.I93 100 1 $aIvanov, A. A.$0451286 245 10$aGeometry of sporadic groups /$cA. A. Ivanov, S. V. Shpectorov 260 $aCambridge ; New York :$bCambridge University Press,$c1999-2002 300 $a2 v. :$bill. ;$c24 cm 440 0$aEncyclopedia of mathematics and its applications ;$v76 440 0$aEncyclopedia of mathematics and its applications ;$v91 504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index 505 0 $aV. 1:$tPetersen and tilde geometries. - xiii, 408 p. 505 0 $aV. 2:$tRepresentations and amalgams. - xviii, 286 p. 650 0$aSporadic groups (Mathematics) 650 0$aFinite geometries 700 1 $aShpectorov, S. V.$eauthor$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0730494 907 $a.b1217628x$b16-11-06$c27-05-03 912 $a991001641289707536 945 $aLE013 20D IVA11 V.I (1999)$cV. 1$g1$i2013000121376$lle013$op$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12525108$z27-05-03 945 $aLE013 20D IVA11 V.II C.1 (2002)$cV. 2$g1$i2013000134482$lle013$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12100110$z20-12-02 945 $aLE013 20D IVA11 V.II C.2 (2002)$cV. 2$g2$i2013000137636$lle013$op$pE82.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i12498397$z09-04-03 996 $aGeometry of sporadic groups$91458147 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale013$b27-05-03$cm$da $e-$feng$genk$h0$i1 LEADER 03965nam 22006014a 450 001 9910220109103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8330-3600-9 035 $a(CKB)111090529190268 035 $a(EBL)197481 035 $a(OCoLC)475901623 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000250825 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11204749 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000250825 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10245052 035 $a(PQKB)10775743 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL197481 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10056135 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC197481 035 $a(oapen)doab114551 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111090529190268 100 $a20030425d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aState level changes in energy intensity and their national implications /$fMark Bernstein ... [et al.] ; prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aSanta Monica, CA $cRand$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (117 p.) 300 $aAt head of title: Science and Technology Policy Institute. 311 08$a0-8330-3416-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 93-98). 327 $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Acronyms; 1. Introduction; Background; Study Objectives; Study Limitations; Future Analysis; Organization of This Report; 2. State-Level Trends in Energy Intensity; 3. Factors Affecting Energy Intensity; Factors That May Explain Differences Across the States; Factors That May Explain Differences Across the Energy-Consuming Sectors; 4. Modeling Energy Intensity; 5. Impact of Factors and Common Effects on Energy Intensity; Total Energy Consumption; Industrial Sector Energy Intensity; Commercial Sector Energy Intensity 327 $aResidential Sector Energy IntensityTransportation Sector Energy Intensity; Comparing Results from 1977-1987 and 1988-1999; 6. Applying the Analysis Results to Examples of Energy Intensity Outcomes; Industrial Sector Example; Commercial Sector Example; 7. Ranking the States with the Greatest Energy Intensity and Residual Effect Reductions; Energy Intensity Rankings by State Across All Sectors; Industrial Sector Rankings; Commercial Sector Rankings; Residential Sector Rankings; Transportation Sector Rankings 327 $a8. What Would Happen to U.S. Energy Intensity If All States Replicated the Top-Ranked or Bottom-Ranked States?9. Conclusions and Thoughts for Future Analysis; A. Data Sources; B. Regression Analysis Results; C. Methodology for Calculating the What-Ifs in Chapter 8; D. Detailed Results of Energy Intensity Analysis; Bibliography 330 $aThe 2001 National Energy Policy calls for continued reductions in energy intensity (energy consumption per dollar of gross economic output). This study was part of an effort to identify state-level factors that may contribute to efficient energy use nationwide. The authors examined changes in energy intensity in 48 states and in the states? energy-consuming sectors from 1977 through 1999. Some factors that may explain differences in states? energy intensity are energy prices, new construction, capacity utilization, population, climate, tech innovations, and government energy policies. 606 $aEnergy policy$zUnited States$xStates 606 $aEnergy conservation$xGovernment policy$zUnited States$xStates 615 0$aEnergy policy$xStates. 615 0$aEnergy conservation$xGovernment policy$xStates. 676 $a333.79/16/0973 701 $aBernstein$b Mark$g(Mark A.)$0904742 712 02$aUnited States.$bDepartment of Energy. 712 02$aScience and Technology Policy Institute (Rand Corporation) 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220109103321 996 $aState level changes in energy intensity and their national implications$92023218 997 $aUNINA