LEADER 04041nam 2200673Ia 450 001 9910220105603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a9786611430276 010 $a1-281-43027-7 035 $a(CKB)1000000000535201 035 $a(EBL)345179 035 $a(OCoLC)437212080 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000260534 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11191945 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000260534 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10223592 035 $a(PQKB)10248106 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL345179 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10227029 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4970053 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL143027 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC345179 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4970053 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000535201 100 $a20080529d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aToward a K-20 student unit record data system for California /$fGeorges Vernez ... [et al.] ; prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aSanta Monica, CA $cRAND Corporation$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (127 p.) 300 $a"RAND Education." 300 $a"MG-695-WFHF." 311 $a0-8330-4436-2 311 $a0-8330-4206-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p.101-102). 327 $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figure and Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One - Introduction; Interest in K-20 Data Systems Is Growing in the United States; Many States Have Made Considerable Progress in Building a K-20 Data System; California Has Many Similar Reasons for Creating a K-20 Data System; California Currently Lags Behind Other States; Differences Between California and Other States Might Make Creating a K-20 System Challenging; Focus of This Study; Study Approach; Study Limitations; Organization of the Report 327 $aChapter Two - California's Current Student Data SystemsIndividual Student Databases for K-12 Students; Individual SUR Databases for Postsecondary Students; Partially Integrated SUR Databases; Fully Integrated SUR Databases; Summary; Chapter Three - Major Challenges and System Design Issues; Major Challenges; System Design and Technical Issues; Summary; Chapter Four - What Next for California?; Complete the Design and Implementation of CALPADS; Identify a Champion to Be an Advocate for a K-20 Data System in California; Obtain Legislative Authority 327 $aBegin Building the K-20 Student Data System IncrementallyDevelop an "Objective" Analytical Capability and Expertise; Is There a Better Alternative?; Appendix A - Selected Characteristics of States Selected for Interviews; Appendix B - Illustrative Interview Protocol; Appendix C - California Student Record Data Systems; References 330 $aTo improve the progression of students through the educational system and to improve education quality, California needs a robust data system that can track an individual student's progress from kindergarten to college and beyond. Such a data system, commonly called a student unit record (SUR), would contain an individual electronic record of every student enrolled in an educational institution. Currently, 18 states can track individual students from kindergarten through postsecondary education, but California is not one of them. The authors of this report document the state of the various stu 606 $aStudent records$zCalifornia 606 $aSchools$zCalifornia$vRecords and correspondence 615 0$aStudent records 615 0$aSchools 676 $a371.2009794 701 $aVernez$b Georges$0847653 712 02$aWilliam & Flora Hewlett Foundation. 712 02$aRand Education (Institute) 712 02$aEbrary Education Subscription Collection. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220105603321 996 $aToward a K-20 student unit record data system for California$92492206 997 $aUNINA