LEADER 03392nam 22005294a 450 001 9910220104303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-03333-6 010 $a9786612033339 010 $a0-8330-4660-8 035 $a(CKB)1000000000718886 035 $a(EBL)423164 035 $a(OCoLC)476261152 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000239229 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12029701 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000239229 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10234540 035 $a(PQKB)10449862 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC423164 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000718886 100 $a20081022d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe role of the United States Postal Service in public safety and security $eimplications of relaxing the mailbox monopoly /$fLois M. Davis ... [et al.] 210 $aSanta Monica $cRAND Corporation$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (221 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8330-4615-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 181-191). 327 $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; CHAPTER ONE- Introduction; Background; Study Approach; Study Limitations; Organization of This Monograph; CHAPTER TWO- The USPS's Monopolies and Its Role in Public Safety; Introduction to the USPS Monopolies; What Happens If the Mailbox Rule Is Relaxed?; The Public Safety and Security Roles of the USPS and Private Couriers; The Role of the IS in Public Safety and Security; CHAPTER THREE- Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on Public Safety and Security Incidents; Types of Security Incidents and Trends 327 $aDifferences Between the USPS and Private Courier Companies in Training, Public Accountability, and OversightSecurity Implications of Relaxing the Mailbox Rule; Summary; CHAPTER FOUR- Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on the IS's Ability to Detect, Deter, and Investigate Crime; Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on Federal JurisdictionOver Mail; Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on Investigation Costs; Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on Tracking Trends in Mail Crime; Relaxing the Mailbox Rule: Effect on the Ability to Deter Crime; Summary 327 $aCHAPTER FIVE- Public Perceptions About Relaxing the Mailbox RuleMethods; Key Survey Findings; Summary; CHAPTER SIX- Conclusions and Issues for Further Consideration; Conclusions; Issues to Be Considered If the Mailbox Rule Were Relaxed; APPENDIX A- Methods; APPENDIX B- Detailed Tables of Incidents; APPENDIX C- Guidelines and Training; APPENDIX D- Differences Between FTC and IS Fraud Data; References 330 $aThe United States Postal Service has a statutory monopoly to deliver mail to mailboxes, but there are arguments to relax that monopoly. This study assesses the public safety concerns of doing so and makes recommendations to address these concerns. 606 $aPostal service$zUnited States$xSafety measures 615 0$aPostal service$xSafety measures. 676 $a363.1 701 $aDavis$b Lois M$0863713 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220104303321 996 $aThe role of the United States Postal Service in public safety and security$92870744 997 $aUNINA