LEADER 03463nam 2200697 a 450 001 9910220104103321 005 20250620110032.0 010 $a9786612033285 010 $a9781282033283 010 $a128203328X 010 $a9780833046437 010 $a0833046438 035 $a(CKB)1000000000718889 035 $a(EBL)423167 035 $a(OCoLC)274035735 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000217482 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11191097 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000217482 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10213259 035 $a(PQKB)10709901 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC423167 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4970043 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4970043 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL203328 035 $a(OCoLC)1027156075 035 $a(SMPINC)0034888 035 $a(SMPINC)1A952ABFA2BCB311 035 $a(oapen)doab114777 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000718889 100 $a20081028d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aPain and gain $eimplementing No Child Left Behind in three states, 2004-2006 /$fBrian M. Stecher ... [et al.] 210 $aSanta Monica, CA $cRAND Corp.$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (169 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a9780833046109 311 08$a0833046101 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 143-144). 327 $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; CHAPTER ONE- Introduction and Methods; Findings from the Previous Monograph; The Current Study; Overview of Standards-Based Accountability Under No Child Left Behind; Study Approach and Methods; How This Report Is Organized; Technical Notes; CHAPTER TWO- Implementation of SBA in California; Background on California's SBA System; California Findings from the ISBA Study; What School Improvement Strategies Were Used, and Which Were Perceived to Be Most Useful? 327 $aWhat Was the Impact of Accountability on Curriculum, Teacher Practice, and Student Learning?What Conditions Hindered Improvement Efforts?; CHAPTER THREE- Implementation of SBA in Georgia; Background on Georgia's SBA System; Georgia Findings from the ISBA Study; CHAPTER FOUR- Implementation of SBA in Pennsylvania; Background on Pennsylvania's SBA System; Pennsylvania Findings from the ISBA Study; CHAPTER FIVE- Conclusions; Common Themes Across the Three States; Trends; Distinctive Approaches by States; Looking Ahead; APPENDIX A- Sampling and Response Rate Tables; APPENDIX B- Results Tables 327 $aBibliography 330 $aPresents information regarding the implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act in California, Georgia, and Pennsylvania from 2003-2004 through 2005-2006, including the final results of the Implementing Standards-Based Accountability project. 606 $aEducational accountability$zCalifornia$vCase studies 606 $aEducational accountability$zGeorgia$vCase studies 606 $aEducational accountability$zPennsylvania$vCase studies 615 0$aEducational accountability 615 0$aEducational accountability 615 0$aEducational accountability 676 $a379.1/580973 701 $aStecher$b Brian M$0879897 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220104103321 996 $aPain and gain$92876293 997 $aUNINA