LEADER 02477nam 2200637 a 450 001 9910220097203321 005 20230725030758.0 010 $a0-8330-5160-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000077046 035 $a(EBL)669766 035 $a(OCoLC)707926708 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000473886 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12160482 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000473886 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10466836 035 $a(PQKB)11379579 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL669766 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10453185 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC669766 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000077046 100 $a20101129d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aToward a comparison of DNA profiling and databases in the United States and England$b[electronic resource] /$fJeremiah Goulka ... [et al.] 210 $aSanta Monica, Calif. $cRAND$dc2011 215 $a1 online resource (32 p.) 225 1 $aTechnical report (Rand Corporation) 225 0 $aIssues in policying 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8330-5121-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction -- How do the U.S. and English systems and processes compare? -- Turnaround times in England and the US -- Comparing the U.S. and English databases and thinking about match-rates. 330 $aRAND researchers explored the U.S. and English forensic DNA analysis systems to find out whether England has capitalized more fully on their crime-fighting potential than the U.S. system, processing samples more quickly and providing more database hits for law enforcement. 410 0$aTechnical report (Rand Corporation) 606 $aEvidence, Criminal$zUnited States 606 $aEvidence, Criminal$zGreat Britain 606 $aChemistry, Forensic$zUnited States 606 $aChemistry, Forensic$zGreat Britain 606 $aDNA$xAnalysis 615 0$aEvidence, Criminal 615 0$aEvidence, Criminal 615 0$aChemistry, Forensic 615 0$aChemistry, Forensic 615 0$aDNA$xAnalysis. 676 $a363.25/8 701 $aGoulka$b Jeremiah E$0870929 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220097203321 996 $aToward a comparison of DNA profiling and databases in the United States and England$92256776 997 $aUNINA