LEADER 03737nam 2200517z- 450 001 9910220084503321 005 20231005 010 $a0-8330-9579-X 035 $a(CKB)3710000000748268 035 $a(oapen)doab115658 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000748268 100 $a20160718c2016uuuu uu 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aSustaining Service Members and Their Families$eExploring Opportunities for Efficiency and Joint Provision of Services Using Nonappropriated Funds 210 $cRAND Corporation$d2016 215 $a1 online resource 311 1 $a0-8330-9429-7 327 $tPreface --$tFigures and Tables --$tSummary --$tAcknowledgments --$tAbbreviations --$g. 1.$tIntroduction:$tStudy Purpose and Focus --$tOrganization of the Report --$g2.$tProgram Area Descriptions: NAF Accounting and NAF Employee Benefits:$tNAF Accounting --$tNAF Employee Benefits --$g3.$tEight Guidelines for Managing Change: Insight from Expert Literature and Case Studies:$tOrganizational Change Literature --$tEight Guidelines for Organizational Change --$tCase Studies Demonstrating Eight Change-Management Guidelines --$tLessons Learned from Case Studies --$g4.$tManaging Change: Analysis and Ways Forward for NAF Accounting and NAF Employee Benefits:$tApplying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Accounting --$tApplying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Employee Benefits --$g5.$tNAF Accounting Consolidation: Cost Analysis and Results:$tNAF Accounting: Goals and Courses of Action --$tApproach to Cost Estimation --$tData Collection --$tMethodology --$tAnalysis --$tResults: Costs and Savings for NAF Accounting RIE Courses of Action --$g6.$tNAF Employee Benefits Efficiency: Cost Analysis and Results:$tNAF Employee Benefits: Setting Coordination Goals --$tApproach to Cost Estimation --$tData Sources --$tMethodology --$tResults of Cost Estimation for NAF Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --$tTotal Costs for NAF Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --$g7.$tConclusions and Recommendations:$tAccounting --$tBenefits$tRecommendations --$tAPPENDIXES:$gA.$tSemistructured Discussion Guide --$gB.$tNAF Employee Benefits Data Gathering --$gC.$tBackground Information for Case Studies --$gD.$tNAF Accounting Cost Detail --$tReferences. 330 $aThe U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) sought to determine whether any administrative activities paid for with funding that was not congressionally appropriated could be consolidated-and, if so, whether consolidation would save costs. A DoD task force listed several areas for improvement, ranging from contracting to information technology. RAND reviewed the work of the task force and assessed specific recommendations. 517 0 $aSustaining Service Members and Their Families 606 $aMilitary and defence strategy$2bicssc 606 $aMilitary history$2bicssc 606 $aPublic international law: treaties and other sources$2bicssc 607 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xCost effectiveness 610 $aHistory 610 $aPolitical Science 615 7$aMilitary and defence strategy 615 7$aMilitary history 615 7$aPublic international law: treaties and other sources 676 $a355.6/1 700 $aConnor$b Kathryn$01241493 702 $aSims$b Carra S. 702 $aLaureijs$b Rianne 702 $aHastings$b Jaime L. 702 $aVan Abel$b Kristin 702 $aWilliams$b Kayla 702 $aSchwille$b Michael 712 02$aNational Defense Research Institute (U.S.), 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220084503321 996 $aSustaining service members and their families$92889723 997 $aUNINA