LEADER 03509nam 2200457z- 450 001 9910220054703321 005 20210211 010 $a978-2-88945-094-7 035 $a(CKB)3800000000216231 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/50542 035 $a(oapen)doab50542 035 $a(EXLCZ)993800000000216231 100 $a20202102d2017 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aInteroception, Contemplative Practice, and Health 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2017 215 $a1 online resource (316 p.) 225 1 $aFrontiers Research Topics 311 08$a2-88945-094-5 330 $aThere is an emergent movement of scientists and scholars working on somatic awareness, interoception and embodiment. This work cuts across studies of neurophysiology, somatic anthropology, contemplative practice, and mind-body medicine. Key questions include: How is body awareness cultivated? What role does interoception play for emotion and cognition in healthy adults and children as well as in different psychopathologies? What are the neurophysiological effects of this cultivation in practices such as Yoga, mindfulness meditation, Tai Chi and other embodied contemplative practices? What categories from other traditions might be useful as we explore embodiment? Does the cultivation of body awareness within contemplative practice offer a tool for coping with suffering from conditions, such as pain, addiction, and dysregulated emotion? This emergent field of research into somatic awareness and associated interoceptive processes, however, faces many obstacles. The principle obstacle lies in our 400-year Cartesian tradition that views sensory perception as epiphenomenal to cognition. The segregation of perception and cognition has enabled a broad program of cognitive science research, but may have also prevented researchers from developing paradigms for understanding how interoceptive awareness of sensations from inside the body influences cognition. The cognitive representation of interoceptive signals may play an active role in facilitating therapeutic transformation, e.g. by altering context in which cognitive appraisals of well-being occur. This topic has ramifications into disparate research fields: What is the role of interoceptive awareness in conscious presence? How do we distinguish between adaptive and maladaptive somatic awareness? How do we best measure somatic awareness? What are the consequences of dysregulated somatic/interoceptive awareness on cognition, emotion, and behavior? The complexity of these questions calls for the creative integration of perspectives and findings from related but often disparate research areas including clinical research, neuroscience, cognitive psychology, anthropology, religious/contemplative studies and philosophy. 606 $aPsychology$2bicssc 610 $aAwareness 610 $aBody awareness 610 $acontemplative practice 610 $ainteroception 610 $aMeditation 610 $amindfulness 610 $asomatic awareness 615 7$aPsychology 700 $aNorman Farb$4auth$01320413 702 $aOlga Pollatos$4auth 702 $aCatherine Kerr$4auth 702 $aWolf E. Mehling$4auth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910220054703321 996 $aInteroception, Contemplative Practice, and Health$93034277 997 $aUNINA