LEADER 03322nam 2200625Ia 450 001 9910219990003321 005 20230617012718.0 010 $a1-282-45137-5 010 $a9780833036149 010 $a9786612451379 010 $a0-8330-3614-9 035 $a(CKB)111090529191300 035 $a(EBL)197450 035 $a(OCoLC)55204026 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000128673 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11152377 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000128673 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10069164 035 $a(PQKB)10129175 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC197450 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL197450 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10056223 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111090529191300 100 $a20031107d2004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aConfronting "the enemy within"$b[electronic resource] $esecurity intelligence, the police, and counterterrorism in four democracies /$fPeter Chalk, William Roseanau 210 $aSanta Monica, CA $cRAND$d2004 215 $a1 online resource (91 p.) 300 $a"MG-100." 311 $a0-8330-3513-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCover; Preface; The RAND Corporation Quality Assurance Process; Contents; Table; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One - Introduction; Chapter Two - Security Intelligence in the United Kingdom; The Terrorist Threat; The Security Service ("MI5"); Chapter Three - Security Intelligence in France; The Terrorist Threat; La Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire; Chapter Four - Security Intelligence in Canada; The Terrorist Threat; The Canadian Security Intelligence Service; Chapter Five - Security Intelligence in Australia; The Terrorist Threat 327 $aThe Australian Security Intelligence OrganisationChapter Six - Assessment and Observations; Strengths; Weaknesses; Chapter Seven - Conclusion; Appendix - The Australian Security Intelligence OrganisationLegislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act, 2003:Background Information; Bibliography; About the Authors 330 $aSince the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, critics have charged that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, while qualified to investigate terrorist incidents after the fact, is not well equipped enough to adequately gather and assess information to prevent attacks. More intrinsically, many believe that given a predominant and deeply rooted law enforcement and prosecutorial culture, the bureau may not be able to change operational focus toward dedicated counterterrorism intelligence gathering and analysis. To better inform debate, researchers analyzed the domestic security structures of 606 $aTerrorism$xPrevention$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aIntelligence service$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aInternal security$vCross-cultural studies 615 0$aTerrorism$xPrevention 615 0$aIntelligence service 615 0$aInternal security 676 $a363.32 700 $aChalk$b Peter$0674558 701 $aRosenau$b William$0818275 712 02$aRand Corporation. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910219990003321 996 $aConfronting "the enemy within"$92256762 997 $aUNINA