LEADER 03523nam 2200625 a 450 001 9910219986503321 005 20240812192615.0 010 $a1-281-43012-9 010 $a9786611430122 035 $a(CKB)1000000000535195 035 $a(EBL)345183 035 $a(OCoLC)476161236 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000115748 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11131882 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000115748 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10027116 035 $a(PQKB)10839489 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC345183 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL345183 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10505595 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000535195 100 $a20071004d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aBuilding partner capabilities for coalition operations /$fJennifer D.P. Moroney ... [et al.] 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aSanta Monica, Calif. $cRand Corp.$d2007 215 $a1 online resource (123 p.) 300 $a"Prepared for the United States Army. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited." 311 $a0-8330-4429-X 311 $a0-8330-4211-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 97-100). 327 $aCover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One - Introduction; Study Objectives; Approach; Organization of the Monograph; Chapter Two - The Challenge of Building Partner Capability and Capacity: Theory and Practice; Assumptions and Theory; The Challenge of Developing Metrics15; The Importance of Train and Equip Programs for U.S.Army Planning; Conclusion; Chapter Three - Identifying U.S. Army Capability Gaps for Coalition Operations; Strategic-Level Guidance Documents; Army Capabilities Studies 327 $aArmy Capability Gaps: A Composite, Illustrative ListConclusion; Chapter Four - Matching U.S. Army Capability Gaps to Candidate Partner Armies; Approach; Illustrating the Process; Conclusion; Chapter Five - Conclusions and Recommendations; Appendix A - Illustrative Train and Equip Programs; Appendix B - Explanation of Capability Gaps; Appendix C - Coalition Partner Contributions to U.S.-Led Operations; Bibliography 330 $aOngoing operations and emerging mission requirements place a heavy burden on Army resources, resulting in capability gaps that the Army is unable to fill by itself. This report argues that one way to fill those gaps is by building the appropriate capabilities in allies and partner armies through focused security cooperation. It argues that U.S. Army planners need a more comprehensive understanding of the types of capability gaps that partner armies might fill and a process for matching those gaps with candidate|partner armies. The report begins by providing a theoretical context for building p 606 $aCombined operations (Military science) 606 $aMultinational armed forces$xOrganization 606 $aMilitary planning$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary relations 615 0$aCombined operations (Military science) 615 0$aMultinational armed forces$xOrganization. 615 0$aMilitary planning 676 $a355.4/6 701 $aMoroney$b Jennifer D. P.$f1973-$0899257 712 02$aUnited States.$bArmy. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910219986503321 996 $aBuilding partner capabilities for coalition operations$92025940 997 $aUNINA