LEADER 04300nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910219978303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-283-22305-8 010 $a9786613223050 010 $a0-8330-5254-3 035 $a(CKB)2670000000107635 035 $a(EBL)744529 035 $a(OCoLC)746746672 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000534467 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11344872 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000534467 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10511576 035 $a(PQKB)11291609 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC744529 035 $a(oapen)doab114935 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000107635 100 $a20110622d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 12$aA big apple for educators $eNew York City's experiment with schoolwide performance bonuses : final evaluation report /$fJulie A. Marsh ... [et al.] 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aSanta Monica, Calif. $cRand$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (313 p.) 300 $a"Prepared for the Fund for Public Schools." 311 08$a0-8330-5251-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Executive Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One: Introduction; A Brief Overview of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program; Purpose of the Evaluation; Data Collection and Analysis; Organization of the Report; Chapter Two: Background on Pay-for-Performance Programs and the New York City SPBP; Background on Pay-for-Performance Programs; Research Findings About School-Based Bonus Programs; The New York City Schoolwide Performance BonusProgram; Summary; Chapter Three: Research Methods; Research Questions 327 $aConceptual FrameworkData Collection and Analysis; Study Limitations; Summary; Chapter Four: Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Attitudes About and Understanding of the Program; General Attitudes; Attitudes About the Bonus; Communication and Understanding; Summary and Discussion; Chapter Five: Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Compensation Committee Process and Distribution Plans; Compensation Committee Process; Distribution Plans: Staff Preferences and Final Plans; Response to Distribution Plans; Summary and Discussion 327 $aChapter Six:Implementation of the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program: Perceived Effects of the Bonus and Program ParticipationSchool Improvement; Effects on Individuals; Summary and Discussion; Chapter Seven: Effects on Progress Report and Student Test Scores; Data; Basic Analytic Approach; Sample; School-Level Analysis: SPBP Effects on Progress ReportComponents; Student-Level Analysis: SPBP's Effect on Student TestScores; Student Test Score Findings; Summary and Discussion; Chapter Eight: Teacher Attitudes and Behaviors in SPBP and Control Schools; Methodology; Findings 327 $aSummary and DiscussionChapter Nine: Conclusions and Implications; Key Findings; Discussion; Recommendations; Implications for Pay-for-Performance Policy; References 330 $aFor three school years, from 2007 to 2010, about 200 high-needs New York City public schools participated in the Schoolwide Performance Bonus Program, whose broad objective was to improve student performance through school-based financial incentives. An independent analysis of test scores, surveys, and interviews found that the program did not improve student achievement, perhaps because it did not motivate change in educator behavior. 606 $aTeachers$xSalaries, etc$zNew York (State)$zNew York 606 $aMerit pay$zNew York (State)$zNew York 606 $aSchool improvement programs$zNew York (State)$zNew York 606 $aAcademic achievement$zNew York (State)$zNew York 615 0$aTeachers$xSalaries, etc. 615 0$aMerit pay 615 0$aSchool improvement programs 615 0$aAcademic achievement 676 $a371.1009747 700 $aMarsh$b Julie A$01124716 712 02$aFund for Public Schools. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910219978303321 996 $aA big apple for educators$92880106 997 $aUNINA