LEADER 04337nam 2200493 450 001 9910219968203321 005 20170919015209.0 010 $a0-8330-9383-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000000595102 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00120747 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000595102 100 $a20200605d2016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCounterinsurgency scorecard update $eAfghanistan in early 2015 relative to insurgencies since World War II /$fChristopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke 210 1$aSanta Monica, California :$cRAND Corporation,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (50 pages) 225 1 $aResearch report 311 $a0-8330-9262-6 327 $aCounterinsurgency Scorecard Update: Afghanistan in Early 2015 Relative to Insurgencies Since World War II -- Findings from Previous Research on Insurgency -- Counterinsurgency Scorecard -- Endgames for Insurgencies: Getting to Negotiated Settlements -- Scoring the Ongoing Conflict in Afghanistan -- Using the Delphi Method -- Building on Previous Scorecards -- 2015 Scorecard Results -- Specific Factors in the Current Case -- Notes on Factors Present or Absent in 2015 but Tenuous in the Future -- 2015 Results Compared with Previous Results and Analyses -- What Improved? -- What Declined? -- What Stayed the Same? -- Scorecard and Duration of Conflict -- Summary of Scorecard Analyses -- Prospects for a Negotiated Settlement -- Conclusions and Recommendations -- APPENDIX : Detail of the Expert Elicitation. 330 $a"Previous RAND research examined 71 insurgencies begun and completed worldwide between World War II and 2010 to analyze correlates of success in counterinsurgency (COIN). A key finding was that a case's score on a scorecard of 15 equally weighted good and 11 equally weighted bad COIN factors and practices corresponded perfectly with the outcomes of the cases analyzed. That is, the balance of good and bad factors and practices was always positive when the outcome was a COIN win (insurgent loss) and always negative when the outcome was a COIN loss (insurgent win). Using the scorecard approach as its foundation, a RAND study sought to apply the findings to the case of Afghanistan in 2015. The effort involved an expert elicitation in which experts were asked to make "worst-case" assessments of the factors to complete the scorecard for ongoing operations in Afghanistan. It was the third Afghanistan-focused exercise conducted with the scorecard, allowing rough comparisons with scores assigned by expert panels in 2011 and 2013. The 2015 consensus results indicated that Afghanistan continues to have a positive score, though its score is tied with the lowest-scoring historical wins. Two factors remained absent in Afghanistan in 2015 but essential to success in historical COIN campaigns: disrupting flows of tangible support to the insurgents and a demonstration (and improvement) of commitment and motivation on the part of the Afghan National Security Forces, the primary COIN force since the coalition drawdown. Despite some potentially positive developments resulting from the 2014 election of a new government in Afghanistan, it appears that the most promising end to the conflict will be a negotiated settlement in which the Afghan government makes some concessions to the insurgents and in which external powers, including the United States and Pakistan, help broker a satisfactory power-sharing agreement that brings greater stability to the country"--Publisher's description. 410 0$aResearch report (Rand Corporation) 606 $aCounterinsurgency$zAfghanistan$vCase studies 606 $aCounterinsurgency$zAfghanistan 606 $aAsymmetric warfare$zAfghanistan 607 $aAfghanistan$2fast 608 $aCase studies.$2fast 608 $aHistory.$2fast 608 $aCase studies.$2lcgft 615 0$aCounterinsurgency 615 0$aCounterinsurgency 615 0$aAsymmetric warfare 676 $a958.10474 700 $aPaul$b Christopher$0905756 702 $aClarke$b Colin P. 801 0$bWaSeSS 801 1$bWaSeSS 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910219968203321 996 $aCounterinsurgency scorecard update$92974941 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05556nam 2201873z- 450 001 9910637778003321 005 20231214133237.0 010 $a3-0365-5438-6 035 $a(CKB)5470000001631759 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/94503 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000001631759 100 $a20202212d2022 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aTraining for Optimal Sports Performance and Health 210 $aBasel$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2022 215 $a1 electronic resource (316 p.) 311 $a3-0365-5437-8 330 $aIn this book, the emphasis is on various training interventions. Types of exercises that can help improve performance in athletes and health in people facing poor movement diseases.Also, we have presented a variety of strength training interventions in the form of various types of research. On the other hand, we continue to monitor internal and external loads related to non-contact injuries and performance analysis. 606 $aHumanities$2bicssc 606 $aSocial interaction$2bicssc 610 $aCOVID-19 610 $aimmune response 610 $achronic diseases 610 $aexercise 610 $aoxidative stress 610 $aanti-inflammatory treatment 610 $afibroblast growth factor 21 610 $acytokines 610 $amyokines 610 $aanabolic?androgenic steroids 610 $aathletes 610 $abaroreflex sensitivity 610 $acardiac autonomic nervous system 610 $acardiac function 610 $aphysical guidance 610 $atracking task 610 $acerebral palsy 610 $achallenge point framework 610 $afrequency 610 $avirtual driving 610 $aphysical activity 610 $abehavioral status 610 $amental state 610 $aolder men 610 $areaction time 610 $avisual coordination 610 $avisual reaction 610 $afemale 610 $afootball 610 $aautonomic modulation 610 $afatigue 610 $atraining load 610 $aaltitude 610 $ahaemoglobin 610 $aerythropoietin 610 $ahypoxia 610 $aendurance 610 $asand 610 $aoccupational health 610 $atactical athlete 610 $alanding error scoring system 610 $areactive strength index 610 $atactical personnel 610 $aforce plates 610 $amilitary 610 $alaw enforcement 610 $aneuromuscular fatigue 610 $aspinal curvature 610 $aParalympic volleyball 610 $acompensation strategy 610 $athoracic hyperkyphosis 610 $aadapted training 610 $alow back pain 610 $akidney failure 610 $aAKI 610 $ahealth 610 $abiomarkers 610 $astrenuous exercise 610 $amountain running 610 $akidney function 610 $aoff-road running 610 $aperformance 610 $akinematics 610 $alaser 610 $acomputer vision 610 $ainertial device 610 $aIMU 610 $ainjury risk 610 $ahigh load 610 $aexternal monitoring 610 $ahigh-speed distance 610 $aglobal positioning system 610 $amovement analysis 610 $ahandball shot 610 $ainternal load 610 $ashot precision 610 $amotor decisions-making 610 $aGPS 610 $aT-Patterns 610 $aacceleration 610 $amotor praxeology 610 $arole 610 $aanatomy 610 $aspine 610 $athoracic spine 610 $alow back 610 $alumbar spine 610 $abiomechanics 610 $arowing 610 $aantioxidant status 610 $anutrition 610 $areactive oxygen species (ROS) 610 $abiomechanical analysis 610 $apressure insoles 610 $aXsens motion capture system 610 $aperformance analysis 610 $arecreational skiers 610 $adry-land training 610 $aGEE modeling 610 $aoxygen consumption 610 $astrength training 610 $asurface electromyography 610 $abone mineral 610 $askeletomuscular robusticity 610 $aelite athletes 610 $aDEXA 610 $aexecutive functions 610 $ashooting performance 610 $agender differences 610 $acadets 610 $aresistance training 610 $apower exercise 610 $ateam sport 610 $aconditioning capabilities 610 $alower extremity 610 $adynamic balance 610 $adose?response 610 $atraining intensity 610 $aelastic bands 610 $achain 610 $aeccentric training 610 $adecline squat 610 $apatellar tendon 610 $asonoelastography 610 $astiffness 615 7$aHumanities 615 7$aSocial interaction 700 $aNobari$b Hadi$4edt$01331647 702 $aFuentes García$b Juan Pedro$4edt 702 $aNobari$b Hadi$4oth 702 $aFuentes García$b Juan Pedro$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910637778003321 996 $aTraining for Optimal Sports Performance and Health$93040528 997 $aUNINA