LEADER 05148 am 22006493u 450 001 9910169181203321 005 20200514132755.0 010 $a3-666-25294-X 010 $a1-280-98500-3 010 $a9786613756619 010 $a3-647-25294-8 035 $a(CKB)2550000000074437 035 $a(EBL)849690 035 $a(OCoLC)775302354 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000565382 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12194555 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000565382 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10532879 035 $a(PQKB)10741311 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC849690 035 $a(OCoLC)774292396 035 $a(ScCtBLL)788986ca-2404-4e77-891c-f0060ac80278 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000074437 100 $a20101123d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe dispute concerning rhetoric in Hellenistic thought$b[electronic resource] /$fYosef Z. Liebersohn 210 $aGo?ttingen $cVandenhoeck & Ruprecht$dc2010 215 $a1 online resource (226 p.) 225 1 $aHypomnemata,$x0085-1671 ;$vBd. 185 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-525-25294-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Preface; Table of Contents; Body; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Foreword; 1.2. Methodology; 1.3. A Survey of the Sources; 1.3.1. Cicero; 1.3.2. Philodemus; 1.3.3. Quintilian; 1.3.4. Sextus Empiricus; 1.3.5. The Prolegomena Literature; 2. The Background to the Debate; 2.1. Preliminary Considerations; 2.2. The Philosophical Schools and Rhetoric; 2.2.1. The Epicureans; 2.2.2. The Peripatetics; 2.2.3. The Stoics; 2.2.4. The Academics; 2.3. The Historical Background; 2.4. Common Assumptions in the Secondary Literature; 2.4.1. Ludwig Radermacher; 2.4.2. Harry Hubbell 327 $a2.4.3. Leeman and Pinkster2.4.4. Jonathan Barnes; 2.4.5. Reinhardt and Winterbottom; 2.5. The Present Study; 3. The Exclusivity of Teaching Argument; 3.1. General Points; 3.2. The Sources; 3.3. The Testimony of Cicero; 3.3.1. The Arguments; 3.3.2. The Target of the Arguments; 3.4. The Testimony of Sextus Empiricus; 3.4.1. The Arguments; 3.4.2. The Target of the Arguments; 3.5. The Testimony of Quintilian; 3.5.1. The Arguments; 3.5.2. The Target of the Arguments; 3.6. The Testimony of Philodemus; 3.6.1. The Arguments; 3.6.2. The Target of the Arguments; 3.7. Conclusion; 4. The Falsa Argument 327 $a4.1. General Points4.2. The Sources; 4.2.1. The Testimony of Quintilian; 4.2.2. The Testimony of Sextus Empiricus; 4.3. The Falsa Argument; 4.3.1. The (Self)Deceiving Orator Argument; 4.3.2. The Rhetoric as Fraud Argument; 4.4. The Target of the Arguments; 4.5. Conclusion; 5. The Benefit Argument; 5.1. General Points; 5.2. Quintilian and the Benefit Argument; 5.2.1. Quintilian, II. ch.16 (Description); 5.2.2. Quintilian, II. ch.16 (Analysis); 5.3. Sextus Empiricus and the Benefit Argument; 5.3.1. Sextus Empiricus, II. 20-47; 5.3.2. The Expulsion Argument; 5.3.3. The General Harm Argument 327 $a5.4. Kakotechnia5.4.1. Sextus Empiricus, II. 12; 5.4.2. Kakotechnia - sources; 5.5. Two Problems; 5.5.1. pro falsis contra veritatem valere; 5.5.2. The Expulsion Argument in Critolaus' Version; 5.6. Conclusion; 6. The End Argument; 6.1. The Sources; 6.2. Introduction to the End Argument; 6.3. The Exclusivity of Attaining the End Argument; 6.4. The Exclusivity of the End Argument; 6.4.1. Analysis of the Exclusivity of the End Argument; 6.4.2. Analysis of the Exclusivity of the End Criticism; 6.4.3. The Surveys and their Sources; 6.5. Lucian; 6.6. Conclusion; 7. The Materia Argument 327 $a7.1. The Sources7.2. Quintilian, II. ch.15-21; 7.3. Quintilian, II. ch.21; 7.4. Sextus Empiricus, II. 48-59; 7.5. The Sources for the Arguments; 7.6. Conclusion; 8. Summary; Bibliography; Index Locorum; Index Nominum (Antiquorum et Recentiorum); Index Rerum Notabiliorum; Back Cover 330 $aHauptbeschreibung Diese Studie rekonstruiert die hellenistische philosophische Debatte u?ber die Rhetorik. In der heterogenen Quellenlage gelingt es Liebersohn, zwei Phasen in den Debatten um den Wert der Rhetorik und zwei Typen von Debatten zu unterscheiden: eine innerphilosophische und eine zwischen Philosophen und Rhetoren.Zuna?chst wird das genaue Umfeld dieses Disputs untersucht, also die Orte, Daten und Personen. Im Anschluss werden fu?nf Hauptargumente gegen Rhetorik rekonstruiert, die alle vom Anspruch der Rhetorik, zu den Ku?nsten zu geho?ren, ausgehen.Diese fu?nf Geg 410 0$aHypomnemata. Untersuchungen zur antike und zu ihrem nachleben ;$vHeft 185. 606 $aRhetoric, Ancient 606 $aPhilosophy, Ancient 615 0$aRhetoric, Ancient. 615 0$aPhilosophy, Ancient. 676 $a808.00938 676 $a880.9353 700 $aLiebersohn$b Yosef Z$0704666 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910169181203321 996 $aDispute concerning rhetoric in Hellenistic thought$91353568 997 $aUNINA