LEADER 04863nam  22006495  450 
001 9910163990403321
005 20200704084412.0
010   $a3-319-52150-0
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-52150-3
035   $a(CKB)3710000001051620
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-52150-3
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4801183
035   $a(PPN)198873832
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001051620
100   $a20170207d2017      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn#008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aUsing Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment /$fby Martina Zele?áková, Lenka Zvijáková
205   $a1st ed. 2017.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (XII, 128 p. 34 illus., 18 illus. in color.)
311   $a3-319-52149-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.
327   $aIntroduction -- 1. Environmental impact assessment - State of the art -- 2. Risk analysis in impact assessment -- 3. Case study ? flood protection measures in the Kru?lov municipality -- 4. Conclusions and recommendations -- Appendices: description of individual parameters. .
330   $aThis book explores the benefits of using risk analysis techniques in the evaluation of flood protection structures, and examines the results of the environmental impact assessment for selected planned flood protection projects. The objective of the book is to propose a methodology for environmental impact assessment in water management. In more detail, flood mitigation measures are investigated with the aim of selecting the best option for the approval process. This methodology is intended to streamline the process of environmental impact assessment for structures in the field of the water management. The book?s environmental impact assessment system for water management structures analyzes the respective risks for different options. The results are intended to support the selection of future projects that pose minimum risks to the environment. Comparison of alternatives and designation of the optimal variant are implemented on the basis of selected criteria that objectively describe the characteristics of the planned alternatives and their respective impacts on the environment. The proposed Guideline for environmental impact assessment of flood protection objects employs multi-parametric risk analysis, a method intended to not only enhance the transparency and sensitivity of the evaluation process, but also successfully addresses the requirements of environmental impact assessment systems in the European Union. These modifications are intended to improve the outcomes of the environmental impact assessment, but may also be applied to other infrastructure projects. The case study proves that the primary aim ? to improve transparency and minimize subjectivity in the environmental impact assessment process specific to flood protection structure projects ? is met for the planned project in Kru?lov, Slovakia. .
606   $aEnvironmental management
606   $aEnvironmental sciences
606   $aCivil engineering
606   $aEnvironmental monitoring
606   $aNatural disasters
606   $aEnvironmental Management$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U17009
606   $aWater Policy/Water Governance/Water Management$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/215000
606   $aEnvironmental Science and Engineering$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G37000
606   $aCivil Engineering$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/T23004
606   $aMonitoring/Environmental Analysis$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/U1400X
606   $aNatural Hazards$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/G32000
615  0$aEnvironmental management.
615  0$aEnvironmental sciences.
615  0$aCivil engineering.
615  0$aEnvironmental monitoring.
615  0$aNatural disasters.
615 14$aEnvironmental Management.
615 24$aWater Policy/Water Governance/Water Management.
615 24$aEnvironmental Science and Engineering.
615 24$aCivil Engineering.
615 24$aMonitoring/Environmental Analysis.
615 24$aNatural Hazards.
676   $a333.7
700   $aZele?áková$b Martina$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0888918
702   $aZvijáková$b Lenka$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910163990403321
996   $aUsing Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment$92514006
997   $aUNINA