LEADER 03610nam  22005295  450 
001 9910163988403321
005 20200706152006.0
010   $a3-319-23645-8
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-23645-2
035   $a(CKB)3710000001051731
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-23645-2
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4802174
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001051731
100   $a20170208d2017      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aSmall Spacecraft Development Project-Based Learning$b[electronic resource] $eImplementation and Assessment of an Academic Program /$fby Jeremy Straub, Ronald Arthur Marsh, David J. Whalen
205   $a1st ed. 2017.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (XII, 231 p. 67 illus., 62 illus. in color.) 
311   $a3-319-23644-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index.
327   $a1.Introduction -- 2.Why start a small spacecraft program? -- 3.To build, to buy, or in between? -- 4.Starting a small spacecraft program: types of programs and their benefits and drawbacks -- 5.Forming a program - funding and organizational issues -- 6.Forming a program: funding and organizational issues -- 7.Forming a program: technical and logistical issues -- 8.Setting educational goals and formative assessment -- 9.Summative assessment -- 10.Results of prior assessment work and its utility.
330   $aThis book provides the information that is required to start a small spacecraft program for educational purposes. This will include a discussion of multiple approaches to program formation and build / buy / hybrid decision considerations. The book also discusses how a CubeSat (or other small spacecraft program) can be integrated into course and/or program curriculum and the ancillary benefits that such a program can provide. The assessment of small spacecraft programs and participatory project-based learning programs is also discussed extensively. The book presents prior work related to program assessment (both for a single program and internationally) and discusses how similar techniques can be utilized for both formative and summative assessment of a new program. The utility of these metrics (and past assessment of other programs) in gaining buy-in for program formation and funding is also considered. .
606   $aTechnical education
606   $aEducational technology
606   $aScience education
606   $aEngineering/Technology Education$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O43000
606   $aEducational Technology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O21000
606   $aScience Education$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/O27000
615  0$aTechnical education.
615  0$aEducational technology.
615  0$aScience education.
615 14$aEngineering/Technology Education.
615 24$aEducational Technology.
615 24$aScience Education.
676   $a607.11
700   $aStraub$b Jeremy$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01061798
702   $aMarsh$b Ronald Arthur$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
702   $aWhalen$b David J$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910163988403321
996   $aSmall Spacecraft Development Project-Based Learning$92520202
997   $aUNINA