LEADER 04148nam  22006252  450 
001 9910163909303321
005 20170308164123.0
010   $a1-316-76023-5
010   $a1-316-76077-4
010   $a1-316-76086-3
010   $a1-316-44290-X
010   $a1-316-76095-2
010   $a1-316-76131-2
010   $a1-316-76104-5
035   $a(CKB)3710000001051979
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781316442906
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4755974
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001051979
100   $a20150427d2017||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aRethinking scholarship $ea transatlantic dialogue /$fedited by Rob van Geste, Hans-W. Micklitz, Edward L. Rubin$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aNew York :$cCambridge University Press,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (xiii, 543 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2017).
311   $a1-107-57872-8 
311   $a1-107-13092-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aWhy we do what we do : comparing legal methods in five law schools through survey evidence / Mathias Siems & Daithi Mac Sithigh -- The jurist in the global age / Neil Walker -- Field, frame and focus : methodological issues in the new legal world / Roger Brownsword -- Transatlantic publication fashions : in search for quality and methodology / Reza Dibadj -- What is legal doctrine : on the aims and methods of legal-dogmatic research / Jan Smits -- Making doctrine for European law / Nils Jansen -- A European advantage in legal scholarship? / Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz -- From coherence to effectiveness : a legal methodology for the modern world / Edward L. Rubin -- Ranking, peer review, bibiometrics and alternative ways to improve the quality of doctrinal legal scholarship / Rob van Gestel -- The logic of law : the analytic foundations of methodology / Neil Komesar -- The role of empirical legal studies in legal scholarship, legal education and policy-making : a U.S. perspective / Deborah Hensler & Matthew Gasperetti -- A behavioural law and economics perspective : do methodolgy and ideology conflate whe behavioural sciences meet law / Orly Lobel -- Freedom and method / Paul Kahn.
330   $aAlthough American scholars sometimes consider European legal scholarship as old-fashioned and inward-looking and Europeans often perceive American legal scholarship as amateur social science, both traditions share a joint challenge. If legal scholarship becomes too much separated from practice, legal scholars will ultimately make themselves superfluous. If legal scholars, on the other hand, cannot explain to other disciplines what is academic about their research, which methodologies are typical, and what separates proper research from mediocre or poor research, they will probably end up in a similar situation. Therefore we need a debate on what unites legal academics on both sides of the Atlantic. Should legal scholarship aspire to the status of a science and gradually adopt more and more of the methods, (quality) standards, and practices of other (social) sciences? What sort of methods do we need to study law in its social context and how should legal scholarship deal with the challenges posed by globalization?
606   $aJurisprudence$zEurope
606   $aJurisprudence$zUnited States
606   $aLaw$zEurope$xAmerican influences
606   $aLaw$zUnited States$xEuropean influences
607   $aEurope$2fast
607   $aUnited States$2fast
607   $aEuropa$2gnd
607   $aUSA$2gnd
615  0$aJurisprudence
615  0$aJurisprudence
615  0$aLaw$xAmerican influences.
615  0$aLaw$xEuropean influences.
676   $a349.4
702   $aGestel$b Rob van
702   $aMicklitz$b Hans-W.
702   $aRubin$b Edward L.$f1948-
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910163909303321
996   $aRethinking scholarship$91899059
997   $aUNINA