LEADER 03085nam  22005292  450 
001 9910163909203321
005 20170303104910.0
010   $a1-316-77602-6
010   $a1-316-77756-1
010   $a1-316-77734-0
010   $a1-316-41081-1
010   $a1-316-77778-2
010   $a1-316-77866-5
010   $a1-316-77800-2
035   $a(CKB)3710000001051980
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781316410813
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4755975
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001051980
100   $a20150313d2017||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aProvisional measures before international courts and tribunals /$fCameron A. Miles, Gray's Inn$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (lxiii, 517 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ;$v128
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2017).
311   $a1-107-56517-0 
311   $a1-107-12559-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; Part I. Preliminary Matters: 2. Origins of provisional measures; 3. Constituent instruments and procedural rules; Part II. Provisional Measures in General: 4. Power to order provisional measures; 5. Purpose of provisional measures; 6. Prejudice and urgency; 7. Content and enforcement; Part III. Specific Aspects of Provisional Measures: 8. Questions of substance and procedure; 9. Litigation strategy and provincial measures; 10. Conclusions.
330   $aSince the decision of the International Court of Justice in LaGrand (Germany v United States of America), the law of provisional measures has expanded dramatically both in terms of the volume of relevant decisions and the complexity of their reasoning. Provisional Measures before International Courts and Tribunals seeks to describe and evaluate this expansion, and to undertake a comparative analysis of provisional measures jurisprudence in a range of significant international courts and tribunals so as to situate interim relief in the wider procedure of those adjudicative bodies. The result is the first comprehensive examination of the law of provisional measures in over a decade, and the first to compare investor-state arbitration jurisprudence with more traditional inter-state courts and tribunals.
410  0$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ;$v128.
606   $aCivil procedure (International law)
606   $aProvisional remedies
615  0$aCivil procedure (International law)
615  0$aProvisional remedies.
676   $a341.5/5
700   $aMiles$b Cameron A.$f1984-$01074798
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910163909203321
996   $aProvisional measures before international courts and tribunals$92581880
997   $aUNINA