LEADER 00990nam0-22003371i-450- 001 990000850980403321 005 20091105155743.0 010 $a0-387-90419-0 035 $a000085098 035 $aFED01000085098 035 $a(Aleph)000085098FED01 035 $a000085098 100 $a20020821d--------km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 105 $ay-------001yy 200 1 $aDifferential analysis on complex manifolds$fR. O. Wells, Jr. 210 $aNew York$cSpringer-Verlag$d1980 215 $aX, 260 p.$d24 cm 225 1 $aGraduate texts in mathematics$v65 610 0 $aGeometria descrittiva, analitica, differenziale 676 $a515 700 1$aWells,$bRaymond O'Neil$f<1940- >$051225 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990000850980403321 952 $a02 13 C 31$b3143$fFINBN 952 $a12-078F$b11563$fFI1 959 $aFINBN 959 $aFI1 996 $aDifferential analysis on complex manifolds$9348470 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03098nam 22004933 450 001 9910163214103321 005 20250731080249.0 010 $a9781782896319 010 $a1782896317 035 $a(CKB)3810000000097934 035 $a(BIP)058039541 035 $a(VLeBooks)9781782896319 035 $a(Perlego)3021470 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32229355 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32229355 035 $a(Exl-AI)993810000000097934 035 $a(Exl-AI)32229355 035 $a(OCoLC)1530383054 035 $a(EXLCZ)993810000000097934 100 $a20250731d2014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aComparison of Initiative During the 1864 Virginia Overland Campaign 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aTBD :$cPickle Partners Publishing,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014. 215 $a1 online resource (129 p.) 327 $aTitle page -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- ABSTRACT -- CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER TWO - THE WAR IN 1864 -- CHAPTER THREE - GRANT AND LEE?S MEANS -- CHAPTER FOUR - INTENTIONS -- CHAPTER FIVE - THE WILDERNESS -- CHAPTER SIX - SPOTTSYLVANIA COURT HOUSE -- CHAPTER SEVEN - BATTLE OF THE NORTH ANNA -- CHAPTER EIGHT - BATTLE OF COLD HARBOR -- CHAPTER NINE - BATTLE OF PETERSBURG -- CHAPTER TEN - AFTERMATH -- REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- BOOKS -- GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS -- PERIODICALS AND ARTICLES -- OTHER SOURCES -- MAPS$7Generated by AI. 330 8 $aThis study is an analysis of the competing initiative displayed between Generals Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee during Grant's 1864 Overland Campaign in Virginia.It begins with Lincoln's appointing Grant as Lieutenant General and General in Chief of all Union armies on March 9, 1864, and concludes with the failure of Grant's June 18 assault at Petersburg, Virginia. Grant and Lee's campaign intentions are analyzed, their means are compared, and their armies' actions are described and analyzed to determine that Lee displayed greater initiative than Grant.Lee demonstrated superior initiative during the campaign because he forced Grant to deviate from his plans and attack formidable defensive positions, and because he held the final initiative. Each of Grant's flanking movements was an attempt to gain the initiative, followed by the destruction of Lee's army. Each time Grant moved, Lee seized the initiative and barred Grant's progress. Grant came closest to achieving his desired objective when he crossed the James River and attacked Petersburg. The attack failed because Grant's senior commanders failed to sustain the Federal initiative. 606 $aStrategy$7Generated by AI 607 $aVirginia$7Generated by AI 615 0$aStrategy 676 $a973.73 700 $aShadburn$b Jeffrey S$01835769 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910163214103321 996 $aComparison of Initiative During the 1864 Virginia Overland Campaign$94412731 997 $aUNINA