LEADER 04069nam  22006855  450 
001 9910163012403321
005 20200702083819.0
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2
035   $a(CKB)3710000001024860
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-50627-2
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4789905
035   $a(PPN)198341776
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001024860
100   $a20170119d2017      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aScientific Scholarly Communication $eThe Changing Landscape /$fby Pali U. K. De Silva, Candace K. Vance
205   $a1st ed. 2017.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (X, 140 p. 2 illus. in color.) 
225 1 $aFascinating Life Sciences,$x2509-6745
311   $a3-319-50626-9 
311   $a3-319-50627-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPreface -- Scientific Scholarly Communication: Moving Forward Through Open Discussions -- Access to Scientific Knowledge: A Historical Perspective -- On the Road to Unrestricted Access to Scientific Information: The Open Access Movement -- Sharing Scientific Data: Moving Towards "Open Data?" -- Free Flow of Scientific Information vs. Intellectual Property Rights -- Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles -- Measuring the Impact of Scientific Research -- Assessing the Societal Impact of Scientific Research -- Final Thoughts: Scientific Scholarly Communication - The March Forward.
330   $aThis book critically examines the historical developments and current trends in the scientific scholarly communication system, issues and challenges in scientific scholarly publishing and scientific data sharing, implications and debates associated with the influence of intellectual property rights on scientific information sharing, and new trends related to peer reviewing and measuring the impact of scientific publications. Based on thorough examination of published literature, the book illustrates the involvement of many stakeholders?scientists, science educators, university administrators, government entities, research funders, and other interested parties?in this complex and dynamic system. The discussion highlights the roles these stakeholders have to play, individually and collaboratively, to help transform the future of the scientific scholarly communication system.
410  0$aFascinating Life Sciences,$x2509-6745
606   $aLife sciences
606   $aCommunication
606   $aLibrary science
606   $aMass media
606   $aLaw
606   $aLife Sciences, general$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/L00004
606   $aMedia and Communication$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/412010
606   $aPopular Life Sciences$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Q25000
606   $aLibrary Science$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/422000
606   $aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R15009
615  0$aLife sciences.
615  0$aCommunication.
615  0$aLibrary science.
615  0$aMass media.
615  0$aLaw.
615 14$aLife Sciences, general.
615 24$aMedia and Communication.
615 24$aPopular Life Sciences.
615 24$aLibrary Science.
615 24$aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
676   $a570
700   $aDe Silva$b Pali U. K$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0981293
702   $aVance$b Candace K$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910163012403321
996   $aScientific Scholarly Communication$92239779
997   $aUNINA