LEADER 03483nam 22006735 450 001 9910162992003321 005 20230807203945.0 010 $a3-11-080051-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110800517 035 $a(CKB)2560000000364352 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001595423 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16288546 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001595423 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14881433 035 $a(PQKB)10697251 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4793513 035 $a(DE-B1597)43087 035 $a(OCoLC)979751579 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110800517 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000364352 100 $a20200617h20151999 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aNietzsche's Affirmative Morality $eA Revaluation Based in the Dionysian World-View /$fPeter Durno Murray 205 $aReprint 2015 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston : $cDe Gruyter, $d[2015] 210 4$dİ1999 215 $a1 online resource (336 pages) $cillustrations, tables 225 0 $aMonographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung ;$v42 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a3-11-016601-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tForeword -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tContents -- $tAbbreviations -- $tI. Nietzsche's Dionysus -- $tII. Contradiction, Duplicity and Opposition -- $tIII: The Language of Redemption -- $tIV: The Basis in Pleasure -- $tV. A Sense of the Earth -- $tVI: Eternal Return -- $tVII: Affirmation: The Love of Fate -- $tConclusion: A Beautiful in Vain? -- $tBibliography -- $tName Index -- $tSubject Index 330 $aThis book argues that Nietzsche bases his affirmative morality on the model of individual responsiveness to otherness which he takes from the mythology of Dionysus. The subject is not free to choose to avoid such responding to the demands of the other. Nietzsche finds that the basic mode of responding is pleasure. This feeling, as a basis for morality, underlies the morality which is true to the earth and the major concepts of ?will to power?, ?eternal return?, and ?amor fati?. The priority of otherness makes all thought ethical and not only aesthetic. The basis of all meanings combines the fundamental impulse of responding outwards with an immediate complement in the individual interpretation-world. This is specifically ethical because the recognition of our own historical specificity arises as a result of the refusal of others to become mere differences within our notion of the Same, and through their demand that we ?become who we are? in the recognition of their separate existence. 606 $aEthics 606 $aLust$xNietzsche, Friedrich 606 $aMoraal 606 $aMoral 606 $aLust 606 $aNietzsche, Friedrich 606 $aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General$2bisacsh 615 0$aEthics. 615 0$aLust$xNietzsche, Friedrich. 615 0$aMoraal. 615 0$aMoral. 615 4$aLust. 615 4$aNietzsche, Friedrich. 615 7$aPHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / General. 676 $a170.92 700 $aMurray$b Peter Durno, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01131052 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910162992003321 996 $aNietzsche's Affirmative Morality$92786564 997 $aUNINA