LEADER 04330oam 2200445z- 450 001 9910162722903321 005 20171019133902.0 010 $a0-9978965-3-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000001043991 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001043991 100 $a20201216c2017uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 200 10$aFrom MAD to madness $einside Pentagon nuclear war planning : memoir /$fby Paul H. Johnstone : introduction and commentary by Diana Johnstone 210 $cClarity Press 311 $a0-9972870-9-8 327 $aIntroduction / by Diana Johnstone -- Part 1. The spirit of the times -- The fog of war planning -- Memoirs of a humanist in the Pentagon / by Paul H. Johnstone -- Foreword: what this is all about -- The world of target planning -- Air targets intelligence -- Air targets doctrine -- Economic war potential doctrine applied to occupation policies -- Some problems and methods -- Playing games with nuclear war -- The Cold War atmosphere -- Games and bonuses -- The rise of fear -- Part 2. Imagining doomsday -- The fallout study -- The "humane alternative" -- The civilian morale study -- The strategic weapons study -- The tenor of the times -- The command and control dilemma -- Exploring "implications" -- Part 3. The critical incident studies -- The Laos crisis -- The Berlin Crisis -- Postface: Doomsday postponed / by Diana Johnstone. 330 $a"This deathbed memoir by Dr. Paul H. Johnstone, former senior analyst in the Strategic Weapons Evaluation Group (WSEG) in the Pentagon and a co-author of The Pentagon Papers, provides an authoritative analysis of the implications of nuclear war that remain insurmountable today. Indeed, such research has been kept largely secret, with the intention "not to alarm the public" about what was being cooked up. This is the story of how U.S. strategic planners in the 1950s and 1960s worked their way to the conclusion that nuclear war was unthinkable. It drives home these key understandings: - That whichever way you look at it -- and this book shows the many ways analysts tried to skirt the problem -- nuclear war means mutual destruction - That Pentagon planners could accept the possibility of totally destroying another nation, while taking massive destructive losses ourselves, and still conclude that "we would prevail". - That the supposedly "scientific answers" provided to a wide range of unanswerable questions are of highly dubious standing. - That official spheres neglect anything near a comparable effort to understand the "enemy" point of view, rather than to annihilate him, or to use such understanding to make peace. Dr. Johnstone's memoirs of twenty years in the Pentagon tell that story succinctly, coolly and objectively. While remaining highly secret - so much so that Dr. Johnstone himself was denied access to what he had written - these studies had a major impact on official policy. They contributed to a shift from the notion that the United States could inflict "massive retaliation" on its Soviet enemy to recognition that a nuclear exchange would bring about Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). The alarming truth today is that these lessons seem to have been forgotten."--Provided by publisher. 517 $aFrom MAD to Madness 606 $aNuclear warfare$xGovernment policy$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aMilitary planning$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aNuclear weapons$xGovernment policy$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aStrategic forces$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aDeterrence (Strategy)$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aCold War 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary policy$xHistory$y20th century 607 $aUnited States$xOfficials and employees$vBiography 615 0$aNuclear warfare$xGovernment policy$xHistory 615 0$aMilitary planning$xHistory 615 0$aNuclear weapons$xGovernment policy$xHistory 615 0$aStrategic forces$xHistory 615 0$aDeterrence (Strategy)$xHistory 615 0$aCold War. 676 $a355.02/170973 700 $aJohnstone$b Paul H$g(Paul Howard),$f1903-1981,$01247839 702 $aJohnstone$b Diana$f1934- 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910162722903321 996 $aFrom MAD to madness$92892479 997 $aUNINA