LEADER 01330nam 2200397 450 001 9910132384903321 005 20200306145143.0 010 $a0-7695-5083-5 035 $a(CKB)3460000000126225 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00119749 035 $a(EXLCZ)993460000000126225 100 $a20200306d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$a2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science $e22-25 October 2013, Beijing, China /$fInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 210 1$aPiscataway, New Jersey :$cInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (139 pages) 311 $a1-4799-0870-3 606 $aScience$xData processing$vCongresses 606 $aWeb services$vCongresses 606 $aCloud computing$vCongresses 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aScience$xData processing 615 0$aWeb services 615 0$aCloud computing 676 $a502.85 712 02$aInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 801 0$bWaSeSS 801 1$bWaSeSS 906 $aPROCEEDING 912 $a9910132384903321 996 $a2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Science$92522403 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01500nas 22004813 450 001 996199393103316 005 20240201213018.0 035 $a(OCoLC)60628449 035 $a(CKB)963018231038 035 $a(CONSER)--2019202439 035 $a(EXLCZ)99963018231038 100 $a20050614a19909999 --- a 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aMilitary & aerospace electronics 210 1$a[Westborough, MA] :$c[Sentry Pub. Co.] 210 21$a[Tulsa, Okla.] :$c[PennWell Pub. Co.] 210 31$aNashua, NH :$cEndeavor Business Media 311 $a1046-9079 517 1 $aMilitary and aerospace electronics 531 $aMILITARY AND AEROSPACE ELECTRONICS 531 $aMIL AEROSP ELECTRON 606 $aElectronics in military engineering$vPeriodicals 606 $aAvionics$vPeriodicals 606 $aAvionique$vPériodiques 606 $aAvionics$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00824383 606 $aElectronics in military engineering$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00907609 608 $aPeriodicals.$2fast 608 $aPeriodicals.$2lcgft 615 0$aElectronics in military engineering 615 0$aAvionics 615 6$aAvionique 615 7$aAvionics. 615 7$aElectronics in military engineering. 676 $a623 676 $a623/.043/05 906 $aJOURNAL 912 $a996199393103316 996 $aMilitary & aerospace electronics$92062593 997 $aUNISA LEADER 02863nam 2200433z- 450 001 9910161648303321 005 20210211 035 $a(CKB)3710000001041981 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/50352 035 $a(oapen)doab50352 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001041981 100 $a20202102d2016 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aInstitutional determinants of social inequality 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2016 215 $a1 online resource (124 p.) 225 1 $aFrontiers Research Topics 311 08$a2-88919-785-9 330 $aUnderstanding the factors that create and maintain social inequalities is a core question in social psychology. Research has so far mainly focused on the role of individual stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. However, there is growing evidence that, beyond the "biased" acts of prejudiced individuals, structural factors related to the very functioning of institutions and organizations can play a role in the reproduction of social inequalities. Indeed, in industrialized countries, society is structured in a way that reflects the perspective of, is organized by, and benefits the dominant groups. In this Research Topic, we propose to bring together researchers who study how institutional ideologies and practices promote norms, rules and opportunities that favor dominant groups and disadvantage dominated groups. This question can be tackled by work investigating how institutional practices (e.g., grading, tracking, recruitment, ...) and ideologies (e.g., meritocracy, individualism, protestant work ethic, ...) shape the psychological experience of (dis)advantaged people. Moreover, another interesting venue is represented by work investigating how the institutional practices and ideologies are enacted by the agents (e.g., teachers, recruiters, leaders, ...). Taking the perspective of agents allows to investigate how institutional functioning constrains the actual opportunities they provide to (dis)advantaged individuals. This could also highlight how institutional ideologies and practices are incorporated by agents, thus revealing mechanisms of change vs. perpetuation of the institutional functioning. 606 $aPsychology$2bicssc 610 $aEducation 610 $agender 610 $aimmigrant 610 $aInstitutions 610 $aSocial Class 610 $asocial inequalities 610 $aSocial reproduction 610 $aStructural barriers 615 7$aPsychology 700 $aFrederique Autin$4auth$01331578 702 $aFabrizio Butera$4auth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910161648303321 996 $aInstitutional determinants of social inequality$93040450 997 $aUNINA