LEADER 06601oam 2201213Ia 450 001 9910160352203321 005 20231121235127.0 010 $a0-309-22479-9 010 $a0-309-45460-3 035 $a(CKB)2670000000410505 035 $a(MH)012708607-2 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000975590 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11617775 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000975590 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11008627 035 $a(PQKB)11606589 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4778866 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000410505 100 $a20101007d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 02$aA data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States /$fCommittee on an Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs ; Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Charlotte V. Kuh, and James A. Voytuk, Paul W. Holland, editors ; Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council of the National Academies$b[electronic resource] 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cNational Academies Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (xvii, 304 p.)$cill. ;$e1 CD-ROM 300 $aIncludes report, methodology, and data tables. 311 $a0-309-16030-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction -- Context and motivation -- Study design -- The methodologies used to derive two illustrative rankings -- Some uses of the data -- The data and principal findings -- Looking ahead --Appendixes. 330 $a"A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States provides an unparalleled dataset collected from doctoral programs, doctoral faculty and public sources that can be use to assess the quality and effectiveness of doctoral programs based on measures important to faculty, students, administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. The committee collected 20 measures that include characteristicsof the faculty, such as publications, citations, grants, and diversity; and characteristics of the students, such as their GRE scores, financial support, publications, and diversity; anc characteristics of the program, such as number of Ph.D.s granted over five years, time to degree, percentage of student completion, and placement of students after graduation. The data were collected for the academic year 2005-2006 from more than 5,000 doctoral programs at 212 universities. these observations span 62 fields and the research productivity data are based typicaly on a five-year interval. Some datasets (such as publications and citations) go as far back as 1981. Information on enrollments and faculty size were also collected for 14 emerging fields ... Accompanying the report are Data tables and a detailed explanation of the methodology used to collect data and calculate ranges of rankings--Summary. 606 $aUniversities and colleges$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aResearch$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aDoctor of philosophy degree$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aScience$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aHumanities$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aSocial sciences$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$zUnited States$xEvaluation 606 $aDoctor of philosophy degree$xEvaluation$zUnited States 606 $aUniversities and colleges$xGraduate work$xEvaluation$zUnited States 606 $aUniversities and colleges$xRatings and rankings$zUnited States 606 $aResearch$xEvaluation$zUnited States 606 $aEducational surveys$zUnited States 606 $aSchools 606 $aEducation 606 $aFinancial Support 606 $aHealth Care Evaluation Mechanisms 606 $aInvestigative Techniques 606 $aEducation, Professional 606 $aQuality of Health Care 606 $aEconomics 606 $aHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation 606 $aHealth Care Economics and Organizations 606 $aHealth Care 606 $aEducational Measurement 606 $aEducation, Graduate 606 $aUniversities 606 $aResearch Support as Topic 606 $aEvaluation Studies as Topic 606 $aEducation$2HILCC 606 $aSocial Sciences$2HILCC 606 $aTheory & Practice of Education$2HILCC 615 0$aUniversities and colleges$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$xEvaluation. 615 0$aResearch$xEvaluation. 615 0$aDoctor of philosophy degree$xEvaluation. 615 0$aScience$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$xEvaluation. 615 0$aHumanities$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$xEvaluation. 615 0$aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$xEvaluation. 615 0$aSocial sciences$xStudy and teaching (Graduate)$xEvaluation. 615 0$aDoctor of philosophy degree$xEvaluation 615 0$aUniversities and colleges$xGraduate work$xEvaluation 615 0$aUniversities and colleges$xRatings and rankings 615 0$aResearch$xEvaluation 615 0$aEducational surveys 615 2$aSchools 615 2$aEducation 615 2$aFinancial Support 615 2$aHealth Care Evaluation Mechanisms 615 2$aInvestigative Techniques 615 2$aEducation, Professional 615 2$aQuality of Health Care 615 2$aEconomics 615 2$aHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation 615 2$aHealth Care Economics and Organizations 615 2$aHealth Care 615 2$aEducational Measurement 615 2$aEducation, Graduate 615 2$aUniversities 615 2$aResearch Support as Topic 615 2$aEvaluation Studies as Topic 615 7$aEducation 615 7$aSocial Sciences 615 7$aTheory & Practice of Education 676 $a378.2 701 $aNational Research Council (U. S.)$01126176 701 $aOstriker$b J. P$01126177 701 $aKuh$b Charlotte V$01126178 701 $aVoytuk$b James A$01126179 801 0$bPQKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910160352203321 996 $aA data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States$92657507 997 $aUNINA 999 $aThis Record contains information from the Harvard Library Bibliographic Dataset, which is provided by the Harvard Library under its Bibliographic Dataset Use Terms and includes data made available by, among others the Library of Congress