LEADER 02714nam  22005172  450 
001 9910159458803321
005 20170302144924.0
010   $a1-316-80076-8
010   $a1-316-80514-X
010   $a1-316-80587-5
010   $a1-316-62681-4
010   $a1-316-79627-2
010   $a1-316-80660-X
010   $a1-316-80733-9
010   $a1-316-80952-8
035   $a(CKB)3710000001008900
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781316796276
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4783994
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000001008900
100   $a20160401d2017||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 12$aA critique of proportionality and balancing /$fFrancisco J. Urbina$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2017.
215   $a1 online resource (xii, 267 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Feb 2017).
311   $a1-107-17506-2 
311   $a1-316-80879-3 
327   $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; Part I: 2. The maximisation account of proportionality; 3. The incommensurability objection; 4. Why proportionality?; 5. Proportionality, rights, and legitimate interests; Part II: 6. Proportionality as unconstrained moral reasoning; 7. The need for legal direction in adjudication; 8. Proportionality and the problems of legally unaided adjudication; Part III: 9. Legal human rights.
330   $aThe principle of proportionality, which has become the standard test for adjudicating human and constitutional rights disputes in jurisdictions worldwide has had few critics. Proportionality is generally taken for granted or enthusiastically promoted or accepted with minor qualifications. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing presents a frontal challenge to this orthodoxy. It provides a comprehensive critique of the proportionality principle, and particularly of its most characteristic component, balancing. Divided into three parts, the book presents arguments against the proportionality test, critiques the view of rights entailed by it, and proposes an alternative understanding of fundamental rights and their limits.
606   $aProportionality in law
606   $aHuman rights
615  0$aProportionality in law.
615  0$aHuman rights.
676   $a342.08/501
686   $aLAW052000$2bisacsh
700   $aUrbina Molfino$b Francisco Javier$01074793
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910159458803321
996   $aA critique of proportionality and balancing$92581874
997   $aUNINA