LEADER 03271oam 2200481I 450 001 9910159450403321 005 20240505184603.0 010 $a1-315-60869-3 010 $a1-317-05625-6 010 $a1-317-05626-4 024 7 $a10.4324/9781315608693 035 $a(CKB)3710000001018892 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4786812 035 $a(OCoLC)967457453 035 $a(BIP)59768125 035 $a(BIP)73217106 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001018892 100 $a20180706d2016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aShakespeare, adaptation, psychoanalysis $ebetter than new /$fby Matthew Biberman 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aNew York :$cRoutledge,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (147 pages) 311 08$a0-367-88188-8 311 08$a1-4724-8153-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. On primary adaptation : Shakespeare, adaptation, and psychoanalysis: the case of Nahum Tate's Lear -- 2. Two instances of secondary adaptation : Otway, Davenant and the birth of the "crossover" episode -- 3. Synchronous adaptation : Hamlet, Macbeth, and The double falsehood -- 4. Crazy love, then and now -- 5. Exit the grave diggers / send in the clowns : Hamlet and The enchanted island. 330 $aIn Shakespeare, Adaptation, Psychoanalysis, Matthew Biberman analyzes early adaptations of Shakespeare's plays in order to identify and illustrate how both social mores and basic human psychology have changed in Anglo-American culture. Biberman contests the received wisdom that Shakespeare's characters reflect essentially timeless truths about human nature. To the contrary, he points out that Shakespeare's characters sometimes act and think in ways that have become either stigmatized or simply outmoded. Through his study of the adaptations, Biberman pinpoints aspects of Shakespeare's thinking about behavior and psychology that no longer ring true because circumstances have changed so dramatically between his time and the time of the adaptation. He shows how the adaptors' changes reveal key differences between Shakespeare's culture and the culture that then supplanted it. These changes, once grasped, reveal retroactively some of the ways in which Shakespeare's characters do not act and think as we might expect them to act and think. Thus Biberman counters Harold Bloom's claim that Shakespeare fundamentally invents our sense of the human; rather, he argues, our sense of the human is equally bound up in the many ways that modern culture has come to resist or outright reject the behavior we see in Shakespeare's plays. Ultimately, our current sense of 'the human' is bound up not with the adoption of Shakespeare's psychology, perhaps, but its adaption-or, in psychoanalytic terms, its repression and replacement. 606 $aPsychoanalysis and literature 615 0$aPsychoanalysis and literature. 676 $a822.3/3 700 $aBiberman$b Matthew$f1966-,$0883615 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910159450403321 996 $aShakespeare, adaptation, psychoanalysis$92002037 997 $aUNINA