LEADER 04489nam  22006975  450 
001 9910155550103321
005 20200702173922.0
010   $a9789811021978
024 7 $a10.1007/978-981-10-2197-8
035   $a(CKB)3710000000964864
035   $a(DE-He213)978-981-10-2197-8
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4748105
035   $a(PPN)228318106
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000964864
100   $a20161124d2016      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aInjury and Causation in Trade Remedy Law$b[electronic resource] $eA Study of WTO Law and Country Practices /$fby James J. Nedumpara
205   $a1st ed. 2016.
210  1$aSingapore :$cSpringer Singapore :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (XLII, 262 p. 8 illus., 7 illus. in color.) 
311   $a981-10-2196-1 
311   $a981-10-2197-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aChapter I: Introduction and Research Design -- Chapter II: Historical evolution of injury and causality in trade remedies under GATT/WTO -- Chapter III: Injury and Causality in Trade Remedy Investigations: An Analysis of the WTO Jurisprudence -- Chapter IV: Injury and causality in antidumping investigations: experience of India and other jurisdictions -- Chapter V: Injury and Causality in Safeguards Investigations: Experience of India and other jurisdictions -- Chapter VI: Injury and Causality in Trade Remedies: Developments under the Doha Round -- Chapter VII: General principles of law on causality: Application in the field of trade remedy investigations -- Chapter VIII: findings and conclusions.
330   $aThis book addresses injury and causation issues in the context of antidumping, countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard investigations that are covered under the WTO. The book traces the origin and the negotiating history of injury and causation in trade remedy instruments and examines how this requirement evolved in the United States and more specifically in the GATT as part of the Kennedy Code, the Tokyo Codes and later the Uruguay Round negotiating texts. The book demonstrates that terms such as ?principal cause,? ?substantial cause? and ?a cause in and of itself? are not necessarily warranted in such instruments. In the light of the experiences of key users of trade remedy instruments and the WTO Doha Round Rules negotiations, the book argues that causation determination does not require mathematical precision. Econometric or quantitative tools may be suggested, but such tools need not undermine the policy-laden nature of trade remedy instruments. Accordingly, the book suggests the use of weak-necessity and strong sufficiency test as a potentially viable causative framework with regard to injury and causation in trade remedies.
606   $aInternational law
606   $aTrade
606   $aMediation
606   $aDispute resolution (Law)
606   $aConflict management
606   $aBusiness
606   $aCommerce
606   $aPrivate international law
606   $aConflict of laws
606   $aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19050
606   $aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R22000
606   $aTrade$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/527010
606   $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002
615  0$aInternational law.
615  0$aTrade.
615  0$aMediation.
615  0$aDispute resolution (Law).
615  0$aConflict management.
615  0$aBusiness.
615  0$aCommerce.
615  0$aPrivate international law.
615  0$aConflict of laws.
615 14$aInternational Economic Law, Trade Law.
615 24$aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
615 24$aTrade.
615 24$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .
676   $a343.07
700   $aNedumpara$b James J$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01059502
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910155550103321
996   $aInjury and Causation in Trade Remedy Law$92506723
997   $aUNINA