LEADER 02813oam  2200469I  450 
001 9910155028103321
005 20230808200730.0
010   $a1-138-25471-1
010   $a1-315-25482-4
024 7 $a10.4324/9781315254821 
035   $a(CKB)3710000000965799
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4758838
035   $a(OCoLC)973040060
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000965799
100   $a20180706e20162001  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 10$aFundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning /$fby Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld ; edited by David Campbell and Philip Thomas ; with an introduction by Nigel E. Simmonds
210  1$aAbingdon, Oxon :$cRoutledge,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (144 pages)
225 1 $aClassical jurisprudence series
300   $aFirst published 2001 by Ashgate Publishing.
311   $a1-85521-668-X 
311   $a1-351-93521-6 
327   $asection 1: Legal conceptions contrasted with non-legal conceptions. Operative facts contrasted with evidential facts. Fundamental jural relations contrasted with one another -- section 2: (a) A right in rem is not a right 'against a thing'. (b) A multital right or claim (right in rem), is not always one relating to a thing, i.e. a tangible object. (c) A single multilateral right, or claim (right in rem), correlates with a duty resting on one person alone, not with many duties (or one duty) resting upon all the members of a very large and indefinite class of persons. (d) A multital right, or claim (right in rem), should not be confused with any co-exisitng privileges of other jural relations that the holder of the multital right or rights may have in respect to the same subject-matter. (e) A multital primary right, or claim (right in rem), should, regarding its character as such, be carefully derentiated from the paucital secondary right, or claim (right in personam), arising from a violation of the former. (f) A multital primary right, or claim (right in rem), should not, regarding its character as such, be confused with, or thought dependent on, the character of the proceedings by which it and the secondary right arising from its violation may be vindicated.
410  0$aClassical jurisprudence series.
606   $aLaw$xMethodology
615  0$aLaw$xMethodology.
676   $a340.01
700   $aHohfeld$b Wesley Newcomb$f1879-1918.,$0232806
701   $aCampbell$b David$f1958-$0291673
701   $aThomas$b Philip A$g(Philip Aneurin)$0929901
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910155028103321
996   $aFundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning$92091101
997   $aUNINA