LEADER 02089oam  2200577M  450 
001 9910154588603321
005 20230126214843.0
010   $a1-00-306000-5
010   $a1-134-79026-0
010   $a1-138-98798-0
010   $a1-003-06000-5
010   $a0-367-08768-5
010   $a0-415-13113-8
010   $a0-203-98112-X
035   $a(CKB)3710000000965317
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4758250
035   $a(OCoLC)966310605
035   $a(OCoLC-P)966310605
035   $a(FlBoTFG)9780203981122
035   $a(OCoLC)1225178584
035   $a(OCoLC-P)1225178584
035   $a(FlBoTFG)9781003060000
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000965317
100   $a20160908e20161997  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 10$aBrute science $edilemmas of animal experimentation /$fHugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks
210  1$aLondon :$cRoutledge,$d2016.
215   $a1 online resource (299 pages)
225 0 $aPhilosophical issues in science
300   $aOriginally published: 1997.
311   $a0-415-13114-6 
311   $a1-134-79027-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330   $aBrute Science investigates whether biomedical research using animals is, in fact, scientifically justified. Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks examine the issues in scientific terms using the models that scientists themselves use. They argue that we need to reassess our use of animals and, indeed, rethink the standard positions in the debate.
606   $aAnimal experimentation$xSocial aspects
606   $aAnimal experimentation$xMoral and ethical aspects
615  0$aAnimal experimentation$xSocial aspects.
615  0$aAnimal experimentation$xMoral and ethical aspects.
676   $a179/.4
700   $aLaFollette$b Hugh$f1948-$0860027
702   $aShanks$b Niall$f1959-
801  0$bOCoLC-P
801  1$bOCoLC-P
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910154588603321
996   $aBrute science$92273898
997   $aUNINA