LEADER 02145oam  2200409zu 450 
001 9910154331103321
005 20251124225803.0
035   $a(CKB)3710000000114971
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001225807
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11719678
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001225807
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11269869
035   $a(PQKB)10193324
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000235441
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4842582
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000114971
100   $a20160829d2014      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aKant's critique of Spinoza /$fOmri Boehm
210  1$aNew York :$cOxford University Press,$d2014.
215   $a1 online resource (xxxiv, 252 pages)
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 08$aPrint version 9780199354801 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aThe One Possible Basis, the Ideal of Pure Reason and Kant's Regulative Spinozism -- The First Antinomy and Spinoza -- The Third Antinomy and Spinoza -- The Causa Sui and the Ontological Argument, or the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Is-Ought Distinction -- Radical Enlightenment, The Pantheismusstreit, and a Change of Tone in the Critique of Pure Reason.
330 8 $aContemporary philosophers frequently assume that Kant never seriously engaged with Spinoza or Spinozism - certainly not before the break of 'Der Pantheismusstreit', or within the 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Offering an alternative reading of key pre-critical texts and to some of the Critique's most central chapters, Omri Boehm challenges this common assumption. He argues that Kant not only is committed to Spinozism in early essays such as 'The One Possible Basis' and'New Elucidation,' but also takes up Spinozist metaphysics as Transcendental Realism's most consistent form in the 'Critique of Pure Reason'.
676   $a193
700   $aBoehm$b Omri$01126584
801  0$bPQKB
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910154331103321
996   $aKant's critique of Spinoza$92836589
997   $aUNINA