LEADER 05098nam 2201225z- 450 001 9910566486803321 005 20220506 035 $a(CKB)5680000000037511 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/81017 035 $a(oapen)doab81017 035 $a(EXLCZ)995680000000037511 100 $a20202205d2022 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aIntegrated Pest Management of Field Crops 210 $aBasel$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2022 215 $a1 online resource (206 p.) 311 08$a3-0365-3761-9 311 08$a3-0365-3762-7 330 $aConsumers in the EU and beyond are increasingly concerned about the impact of pesticides on the environment and human health. In the context of EU phytosanitary and environmental policies, the common EU challenge is to reduce dependence on chemicals, improve food quality and increase the potential for developing more bio-based production systems. Therefore, novel control methods and new strategies that reduce the current dependence on insecticides need to be developed, applied and disseminated among stakeholders. As a cornerstone of sustainable agriculture, integrated pest management (IPM) aims to improve farmers' practices to achieve higher profits while improving environmental quality. Implementing the principles of IPM in agricultural production requires new and up-to-date knowledge generated by science and accepted by farmers. In this Special Issue, we focus on recent advances and methods for IPM in field crops. It contains eight original research articles and two review articles dealing with different aspects of IPM in some of the major field crops: Potato, Maize, Soybean, Sugar Beet, Barley, Rice, Eggplant and Quinoa as well as farmer education issues on IPM. The studies published refer to all the basic principles of IPM and give examples of their implementation in different crops and cropping systems. Research on various aspects of the implementation of IPM in crop production is a continuous need. The research presented helps to provide a mosaic picture with examples of how crop-specific, site-specific and knowledge-intensive IPM practices should be considered and translated into workable practices. 606 $aBiology, life sciences$2bicssc 606 $aResearch & information: general$2bicssc 606 $aTechnology, engineering, agriculture$2bicssc 610 $aalien pest 610 $aantibiosis 610 $aantixenosis 610 $abarley leaf scald 610 $abarley net blotch 610 $abiocontrol 610 $abiodiversity 610 $abiopesticides 610 $aBt toxins 610 $aclick beetle 610 $acompanion plant 610 $aconventional insecticides 610 $acrop damage 610 $acrop farming 610 $acrop residues 610 $adamage severity 610 $adegradation 610 $aDiabrotica virgifera virgifera 610 $adominance 610 $aecosystem health 610 $aeggplant cultivars 610 $aenvironmental protection 610 $aEurysacca melanocampta 610 $afall armyworm 610 $afarmers' knowledge 610 $aFrankliniella occidentalis 610 $afrequency 610 $agenotype 610 $ageometric morphometrics 610 $agreen peach aphid 610 $aground beetles 610 $ahabitat manipulation 610 $aimidacloprid 610 $ainsect ecology 610 $aintegrated pest management 610 $aIPM 610 $aItaly 610 $alandscape feature 610 $aLiriomyza huidobrensis 610 $aMacrosiphum euphorbiae 610 $amaize yield losses 610 $amalt barley 610 $amutual fund 610 $an/a 610 $anatural enemies 610 $aneonicotinoids 610 $anitrogen rate 610 $aOryza sativa 610 $aperception 610 $aPeru 610 $apest control 610 $apest management practices 610 $apest monitoring 610 $aphytosanitary measures 610 $apre-sowing soil activities 610 $aquinoa 610 $aresidues 610 $aresistance 610 $arice root-knot nematode 610 $arisk assessment 610 $aSNPs 610 $asoil fauna 610 $asoybean 610 $aSpodoptera frugiperda 610 $asugar beet 610 $asustainable agriculture 610 $athiamethoxam 610 $atolerance 610 $atrap crop technique 610 $aupland rice cultivation 615 7$aBiology, life sciences 615 7$aResearch & information: general 615 7$aTechnology, engineering, agriculture 700 $aBaz?ok$b Renata$4edt$01322437 702 $aBaz?ok$b Renata$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910566486803321 996 $aIntegrated Pest Management of Field Crops$93035002 997 $aUNINA LEADER 02416nam 22004933 450 001 9910151786903321 005 20250604080323.0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000911541 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4781630 035 $a(VLeBooks)9780750981309 035 $a(Perlego)1530479 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC32131473 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL32131473 035 $a(OCoLC)1522805028 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000911541 100 $a20250604d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAchtung Spitfire $eEagle Day 14 August 1940 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aLondon :$cHistory Press Limited, The,$d2010. 210 4$dİ2010. 215 $a1 online resource (224 p.) 311 08$a9780752457208 311 08$a0752457209 311 08$a9780750981309 311 08$a075098130X 330 $a 14 August 1940, which Hitler code-named 'Adlertag', or 'Eagle Day', was fated to become one of the most significant days in the Battle of Britain. It signified the start of the Luftwaffe's aerial offensive, planned to cripple Britain and clear the path for the German troops ammased in readiness for invasion. The Luftwaffe sent out waves of unescorted bombers to attack difficult and long-range targets by daylight, hoping to confuse and split the fighter defences with the small but numerous bomb formations. The tactic was a calculated gamble and one that cost the Germans deeply. Despite successes in attacking and damaging airfields, the losses were severe and and the following day Goering vetoed such tactics, now convinced his bombers could never operate over Britain without fighter cover. Using first-hand recollections of both Luftwaffe and RAF pilots as well as local witnesses to the day's action, gleaned from interviews and written accounts and with many unpublished photographs, Hugh Trivett has collated the definitive record of Eagle Day. 606 $aBritain, Battle of, Great Britain, 1940 606 $aWorld War, 1939-1945 615 0$aBritain, Battle of, Great Britain, 1940. 615 0$aWorld War, 1939-1945. 676 $a940.54211 700 $aTrivett$b Hugh$01241454 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910151786903321 996 $aAchtung Spitfire$94385058 997 $aUNINA