LEADER 02244nam 22004935 450 001 9910150218603321 005 20230808200523.0 010 $a0-674-97471-9 010 $a0-674-97473-5 024 7 $a10.4159/9780674974739 035 $a(CKB)3710000000942220 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4742338 035 $a(DE-B1597)476932 035 $a(OCoLC)979756013 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780674974739 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000942220 100 $a20170310d2016 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aLaw's Abnegation /$fAdrian Vermeule 210 1$aCambridge, MA : $cHarvard University Press, $d[2016] 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (267 pages) 311 $a0-674-97144-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tIntroduction. The Abnegation of Law's Empire -- $t1. The Legality of Administrative Law -- $t2. Separation of Powers without Idolatry -- $t3. Deference and Due Process -- $t4. Rationally Arbitrary Decisions -- $t5. Thin Rationality Review -- $t6. How Law Empowers Nonlawyers -- $tConclusion Law on the Margin -- $tNotes -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIndex of Cases -- $tGeneral Index 330 $aAdrian Vermeule argues that the arc of law has bent steadily toward deference to the administrative state, which has greater democratic legitimacy and technical competence to confront issues such as climate change, terrorism, and biotechnology. The state did not shove lawyers and judges out of the way; they moved freely to the margins of power. 606 $aAdministrative agencies$zUnited States 606 $aAdministrative discretion$zUnited States 606 $aJudicial review of administrative acts$zUnited States 615 0$aAdministrative agencies 615 0$aAdministrative discretion 615 0$aJudicial review of administrative acts 676 $a342.73/06 700 $aVermeule$b Adrian.$0607222 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910150218603321 996 $aLaw's Abnegation$92890397 997 $aUNINA