LEADER 03556nam 22005295 450 001 9910149493003321 005 20210202111235.0 010 $a9782759824861 010 $a2759824861 024 7 $a10.1051/978-2-7598-2486-1 035 $a(CKB)3580000000002041 035 $a(DE-B1597)573471 035 $a(OCoLC)1233041127 035 $a(DE-B1597)9782759824861 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/78998 035 $a(Perlego)3058214 035 $a(oapen)doab78998 035 $a(EXLCZ)993580000000002041 100 $a20210202h20212012 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe major accident at Fukushima /$fÉtienne-Émile Beaulieu, Édouard Brézin, Jacques Friedel, Alain Carpentier 210 $cEDP SCIENCES$d2012 210 1$aLes Ulis : $cEDP Sciences, $d[2021] 210 4$d©2012 215 $a1 online resource (90 p.) 225 0 $aAcadémie des sciences 311 08$a9782759807550 311 08$a275980755X 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tCONTENTS -- $tPRESENTATION -- $tFIRST PART. Megaseisms and megatsunamis -- $tSECOND PART. The nuclear accident -- $tTHIRD PART. Consequences on health and the environment 330 $a"On March 11, 2011, the North-East of Japan was struck by a huge earthquake followed by a major tsunami and a series of accidents that took place at the nuclear power site at Fukushima, with emissions of radioactive elements". This was the message addressed by Prof. Kanazawa, President of the Science Council of Japan (SCJ), only a few days after the catastrophe, to his colleagues Presidents of the Science Academies, adding that he nourished the hope the "the academies would continue in the future to help with the necessary rehabilitation work". The idea arose immediately to set up an ad hoc academic Working Party, with the assigned mission to analyse the events that had taken place in Japan, to make a status report regarding seismic and nuclear risks both in metropolitan France and in overseas territories and to draw conclusions and make recommendations as deemed appropriate to the situation. The academic Working Party comprised three separate sub-groups, each dealing with one of the three aspects - seismic, nuclear and medical - of the drama as it unfolded. For each of these components, objects of the three parts of this report, the analysis of observed events in Fukushima was supplemented by a reflection o the strengths and weaknesses of these areas in France, in order to formulate the necessary recommendations and to answer scientific and societal question public arises. Although uncertainties remain and that new information still come each month to enrich the record, the enclosed reports seemed complete enough to be published in the state, after the anniversary of this tragedy that will long continue to challenge us. 606 $aSCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear$2bisacsh 610 $anuclear accident 610 $aFukushima 615 7$aSCIENCE / Physics / Nuclear. 700 $aBeaulieu$b Étienne-Émile, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0802710 702 $aBrézin$b Édouard, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 702 $aFriedel$b Jacques, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910149493003321 996 $aThe major accident at Fukushima$92244516 997 $aUNINA