LEADER 03881nam 22004695 450 001 9910148610003321 005 20230823004259.0 010 $a1-5036-0083-1 024 7 $a10.1515/9781503600836 035 $a(CKB)3710000000921695 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4729788 035 $a(DE-B1597)564208 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781503600836 035 $a(OCoLC)1178768955 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000921695 100 $a20200723h20202017 fg 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aNewsworthy $eThe Supreme Court Battle over Privacy and Press Freedom /$fSamantha Barbas 210 1$aStanford, CA : $cStanford University Press, $d[2020] 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (349 pages) 311 $a0-8047-9710-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tIntroduction -- $t1. The Whitemarsh Incident -- $t2. Fact into Fiction -- $t3. The Article -- $t4. The Lawsuit -- $t5. Privacy -- $t6. Freedom of the Press -- $t7. Suing the Press -- $t8. Maneuvers -- $t9. The Trial -- $t10. The Privacy Panic -- $t11. Appeals -- $t12. Griswold -- $t13. Nixon -- $t14. At the Court -- $t15. Decisions -- $t16. January 9, 1967 -- $t17. The Aftermath -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tNotes -- $tBibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aIn 1952, the Hill family was held hostage by escaped convicts in their suburban Pennsylvania home. The family of seven was trapped for nineteen hours by three fugitives who treated them politely, took their clothes and car, and left them unharmed. The Hills quickly became the subject of international media coverage. Public interest eventually died out, and the Hills went back to their ordinary, obscure lives. Until, a few years later, the Hills were once again unwillingly thrust into the spotlight by the media?with a best-selling novel loosely based on their ordeal, a play, a big-budget Hollywood adaptation starring Humphrey Bogart, and an article in Life magazine. Newsworthy is the story of their story, the media firestorm that ensued, and their legal fight to end unwanted, embarrassing, distorted public exposure that ended in personal tragedy. This story led to an important 1967 Supreme Court decision?Time, Inc. v. Hill?that still influences our approach to privacy and freedom of the press. Newsworthy draws on personal interviews, unexplored legal records, and archival material, including the papers and correspondence of Richard Nixon (who, prior to his presidency, was a Wall Street lawyer and argued the Hill family's case before the Supreme Court), Leonard Garment, Joseph Hayes, Earl Warren, Hugo Black, William Douglas, and Abe Fortas. Samantha Barbas explores the legal, cultural, and political wars waged around this seminal privacy and First Amendment case. This is a story of how American law and culture struggled to define and reconcile the right of privacy and the rights of the press at a critical point in history?when the news media were at the peak of their authority and when cultural and political exigencies pushed free expression rights to the forefront of social debate. Newsworthy weaves together a fascinating account of the rise of big media in America and the public's complex, ongoing love-hate affair with the press. 606 $aPrivacy, Right of$zUnited States 606 $aFreedom of the press$zUnited States 610 $aTime, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374 (1967) 615 0$aPrivacy, Right of 615 0$aFreedom of the press 676 $a342.7308/58 700 $aBarbas$b Samantha, $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01094093 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910148610003321 996 $aNewsworthy$92788372 997 $aUNINA