LEADER 03115nam 2200541 450 001 9910808241003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a3-11-053941-1 010 $a3-11-054105-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110541052 035 $a(CKB)4100000004244546 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5158897 035 $a(DE-B1597)480203 035 $a(OCoLC)1037981360 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110541052 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5158897 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11566992 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000004244546 100 $a20180614d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aArticle emergence in Old English $ea constructionalist perspective /$fLotte Sommerer 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter,$d[2018] 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (376 pages) 225 0 $aTopics in English Linguistics [TiEL] ;$v99 311 $a3-11-053937-3 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tAcknowledgements -- $tContents -- $tTables -- $tFigures -- $tList of Abbreviations -- $t1. Introduction -- $t2. Nominal determination and the articles in Present Day English -- $t3. Article emergence in Old English -- $t4. Diachronic Construction Grammar -- $t5. Nominal determination in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle -- $t6. Nominal determination in Old English prose -- $t7. Article emergence: a constructional scenario -- $t8. Conclusion -- $t9. Appendix: manuscript and corpus information -- $tReferences -- $tIndex 330 $aThis book investigates nominal determination in Old English and the emergence of the definite and the indefinite article. Analyzing Old English prose texts, it discusses the nature of linguistic categorization and argues that a usage-based, cognitive, constructionalist approach best explains when, how and why the article category developed. It is shown that the development of the OE demonstrative 'se' (that) and the OE numeral 'an' (one) should not be told as a story of two individual, grammaticalizing morphemes, but must be reconceptualized in constructional terms. The emergence of the morphological category 'article' follows from constructional changes in the linguistic networks of OE speakers and especially from 'grammatical constructionalization' (i.e. the emergence of a new, schematic, mostly procedural form-meaning pairing which previously did not exist in the constructicon). Next to other functional-cognitive reasons, the book especially highlights analogy and frequency effects as driving forces of linguistic change. 606 $aEnglish language$xWord formation 610 $aAnalogy. 610 $aArticles. 610 $aConstructionalization. 610 $aDefiniteness. 610 $aNominal Determination. 615 0$aEnglish language$xWord formation. 676 $a422 700 $aSommerer$b Lotte$01695209 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808241003321 996 $aArticle emergence in Old English$94074292 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01658oas 2200685 a 450 001 9910146292903321 005 20251106213014.0 035 $a(DE-599)ZDB2405717-4 035 $a(OCoLC)405747012 035 $a(CONSER) 2011238350 035 $a(CKB)1000000000440936 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000440936 100 $a20090218a20069999 sy 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aSiauliai mathematical seminar 210 $aS?iauliai, Lithuania $cS?iauliai University Publishing House 300 $aRefereed/Peer-reviewed 311 08$a1822-511X 606 $aMathematics$vPeriodicals 606 $aMathematics$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01012163 608 $aperiodicals.$2aat 608 $aPeriodicals.$2fast 608 $aPeriodicals.$2lcgft 608 $aPe?riodiques.$2rvmgf 615 0$aMathematics 615 7$aMathematics. 686 $a17,1$2ssgn 686 $a770$2zdbs 686 $a790$2zdbs 712 02$aS?iauliu? Universitetas 801 0$bAU@ 801 1$bAU@ 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bDEBBG 801 2$bGBVCP 801 2$bQE2 801 2$bKSU 801 2$bIUL 801 2$bGWDNB 801 2$bCUS 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bLND 801 2$bVT2 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCL 801 2$bUEJ 801 2$bOCLCQ 906 $aJOURNAL 912 $a9910146292903321 996 $aSiauliai mathematical seminar$92230062 997 $aUNINA