LEADER 04009 am 22007693u 450 001 9910141639103321 005 20221206172729.0 010 $a9783863951009$b(ebook) 035 $a(CKB)2670000000344222 035 $a(MARCnow)har135001048 035 $a(MH)013652856-2 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000889699 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12440355 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000889699 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10882731 035 $a(PQKB)10972797 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-gup-608 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000344222 100 $a20130618d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurm|#---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNegotiating tradition $ethe pragmatics of international deliberations on cultural property /$fStefan Groth 210 1$aGöttingen :$cUniversitätsverlag Göttingen,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (ix, 190 pages ) $cillustrations; digital file(s) 225 1 $aGöttingen Studies in Cultural Property ;$vVolume 4 300 $aDissertation. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aCommunicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors? positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in ? the entailing text and talk of negotiations ? is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues. 410 0$aGöttinger Studien zu Cultural Property ;$v4. 606 $aNegotiation$xMethodology 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aCultural property$xProtection 606 $aIntellectual property$xProtection 606 $aCultural policy 606 $aDiscourse analysis 606 $aCultural property$xProtection (International law) 606 $aNegotiation$xMethodology 606 $aPragmatics$xProtection 606 $aCultural property$xProtection 606 $aIntellectual property 606 $aCultural policy 606 $aSocial Sciences$2HILCC 606 $aPsychology$2HILCC 615 0$aNegotiation$xMethodology. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection. 615 0$aIntellectual property$xProtection. 615 0$aCultural policy. 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection (International law) 615 0$aNegotiation$xMethodology 615 0$aPragmatics$xProtection 615 0$aCultural property$xProtection 615 0$aIntellectual property 615 0$aCultural policy 615 7$aSocial Sciences 615 7$aPsychology 700 $aGroth$b Stefan$0801018 801 0$bNyNyMAR 801 1$bNyNyMAR 801 2$bUkMaJRU 912 $a9910141639103321 996 $aNegotiating tradition$92258854 997 $aUNINA