LEADER 02209nam 2200421 n 450 001 996393042903316 005 20200824121741.0 035 $a(CKB)4940000000110447 035 $a(EEBO)2240960240 035 $a(UnM)99866753e 035 $a(UnM)99866753 035 $a(EXLCZ)994940000000110447 100 $a19940419d1658 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 10$aDemophilos, or, The assertor of the peoples liberty$b[electronic resource] $eplainly demonstrating by the principles even of nature itself, and by the primitive constitutions of all governments since the creation of the world. That the very essence and the fundamental of all governments and laws, was meerly the safety of the people, and the advancement of their rights and liberries [sic]. To which is added the general consent of all Parliaments in the nation, and the concurrence of theescore and two kings since first this island was visble in earnest and by commerce with other nations hath been refined from fable and neglect. By William Prynne Esq; a bencher of Lincolns-Inne 210 $aLondon $cprinted for Francis Coles in the Old-Baily$d1658 215 $a[8], 64 p 300 $aOriginally published in 1656 as: A summary collection of the principal fundamental rights liberties, proprieties of all English freemen. 300 $aRunning title reads: A summary collection of the principal, fundamental rights, &c. 300 $aLine 6 reads: plainly demonstrating by the. 300 $aAnnotation on Thomason copy: "march 3d"; imprint date is crossed out and "1657" written in. 300 $aReproduction of the original in the British Library. 330 $aeebo-0018 606 $aCivil rights$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800 606 $aLaw$zEngland$vEarly works to 1800 607 $aGreat Britain$xConstitutional history$vEarly works to 1800 615 0$aCivil rights 615 0$aLaw 700 $aPrynne$b William$f1600-1669.$0198500 801 0$bCu-RivES 801 1$bCu-RivES 801 2$bCStRLIN 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996393042903316 996 $aDemophilos, or, The assertor of the peoples liberty$92364883 997 $aUNISA LEADER 03563 am 22006253u 450 001 9910141632303321 005 20230621141519.0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000344237 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000985795 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11563475 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000985795 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10932930 035 $a(PQKB)10943920 035 $a(OCoLC)881120703 035 $a(WaSeSS)Ind00073684 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64559 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000344237 100 $a20160829h20122012 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurmn#nnn||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAmtsmißbrauch $eEine rechtsvergleichende untersuchung zu Artikel 323 des italienischen Strafgesetzbuchs /$fKlaus Alten 210 $cUniversitätsverlag Göttingen$d2012 210 1$aGöttingen :$cUniversitätsverlag Göttingen$d2012. 210 4$d©2012 215 $a1 online resource (xviii, 559 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aGöttinger Studien zu den Kriminalwissenschaften ;$vBand 21 311 08$aPrint version: 3863950372 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [513]-559) 330 $aDas Phänomen des Mißbrauchs von Amtsbefugnissen ist in sämtlichen Gesellschaften verbreitet. Im Gegensatz zum deutschen hat der italienische Gesetzgeber den Amtsmißbrauch in Artikel 323 codice penale unter Strafe gestellt. Das Delikt hat durch die Anklage hochgestellter Politiker in Italien aktuell auch in Deutschland Bekanntheit erlangt. Die Bestimmung weist eine bewegte Geschichte auf und war in Italien Gegenstand heftiger wissenschaftlicher Auseinandersetzungen. Darauf geht die vorliegende Abhandlung anhand der Erläuterung der Tatbestandsmerkmale ein. Darüber hinaus wird untersucht, worin die Gründe für das Fehlen einer entsprechenden Norm im deutschen Recht zu sehen sind und inwiefern eine Inkriminierung der Zweckentfremdung von Amtskompetenzen hierzulande unter den Gesichtspunkten der Strafwürdigkeit und Strafbedürftigkeit in Betracht käme. 330 $aThe phenomenon of abuse of official powers is widespread in all societies. In contrast to German, the Italian legislator has criminalized the abuse of office in Article 323 codice penale. The crime has also gained notoriety in Germany through the indictment of high-ranking politicians in Italy. The provision has a turbulent history and has been the subject of intense scientific debate in Italy. The present paper deals with the explanation of the facts. In addition, it examines the reasons for the lack of a corresponding standard in German law and to what extent discrimination of the misappropriation of official competences in this country would be considered from the point of view of criminality and punishment. 410 0$aGöttinger Studien zu den Kriminalwissenschaften ;$vBand 21. 606 $aAbuse of rights 610 $aAbuse of One's Position 610 $aCulpability 610 $aCriminology 610 $aAmtsdelikt 610 $aDelikt 610 $aItalien 610 $aLegislative 610 $aStrafgesetzbuch (Deutschland) 610 $aStrafrecht 610 $aTatbestand 615 0$aAbuse of rights. 676 $a345.4302323 700 $aAlten$b Klaus$0917074 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bAuAdUSA 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910141632303321 996 $aAmtsmißbrauch$92055902 997 $aUNINA