LEADER 03917nam 2200769Ia 450 001 9910140743903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-511-85027-1 010 $a1-107-20561-1 010 $a1-282-72340-5 010 $a9786612723407 010 $a0-511-77567-9 010 $a0-511-77643-8 010 $a0-511-77385-4 010 $a0-511-76282-8 010 $a0-511-77278-5 010 $a0-511-77491-5 035 $a(CKB)2670000000032466 035 $a(EBL)542910 035 $a(OCoLC)652626126 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000420916 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11310086 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000420916 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10405280 035 $a(PQKB)11448075 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511762826 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC542910 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL542910 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10406670 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL272340 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000032466 100 $a20100621d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aInternet jurisdiction and choice of law $elegal practices in the EU, US and China /$fFaye Fangfei Wang 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aCambridge ;$aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (xiv, 261 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-19933-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Jurisdiction in electronic contracting -- EU rules applied in cyber jurisdiction -- US jurisdiction tests employed in e-contracting disputes -- Chinese legislation on jurisdiction -- Choice of law in electronic contracting -- EU internet choice of law regime -- US internet choice of law rules -- Chinese internet choice of law approaches -- Alternative dispute resolution and the internet -- The legal obstacles and solutions to online arbitration and online mediation -- Conclusion and recommendation. 330 $aThe adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions. 606 $aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce$zChina 606 $aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce$zUnited States 606 $aOnline dispute resolution$zChina 606 $aOnline dispute resolution$zUnited States 606 $aOnline dispute resolution$zEuropean Union countries 615 0$aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce 615 0$aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce 615 0$aConflict of laws$xElectronic commerce 615 0$aOnline dispute resolution 615 0$aOnline dispute resolution 615 0$aOnline dispute resolution 676 $a343/.08 700 $aWang$b Faye Fangfei$0514088 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910140743903321 996 $aInternet jurisdiction and choice of law$9825664 997 $aUNINA