LEADER 03387oam 22005414a 450 001 9910140448003321 005 20230407230513.0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000557899 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001684420 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16517250 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001684420 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15045114 035 $a(PQKB)11094955 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00056808 035 $a(OCoLC)1164531168 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse87124 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/30009 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000557899 100 $a20200602d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurc|#|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aOf Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy$fMichael Munro 210 $aBrooklyn, NY$cpunctum books$d2013 210 1$aBrooklyn, NY :$cPunctum Books,$d2013. 210 4$dİ2013. 215 $a1 online resource (60 pages) $cillustrations 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$aPrint version: 9780615822549 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 39-43). 330 $aWhat is a problem? What's asked in that question, and how does one even begin to take its measure? How else could one begin, except as one does with any other problem--by way of its impulsion. Of Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy is about philosophy because philosophy is about problems: philosophy, in a word, is where problems become a problem. After Anti-Oedipus, in the Kafka book and in A Thousand Plateaus, what Deleuze and Guattari counsel, strikingly, is sobriety. Sobriety is what they praise in Kafka. And it is sobriety that seems above all else to be necessary here. (Steven Shaviro has pointed out the prominence of structure in Deleuze's writing: "even when Deleuze's prose, by himself or with Guattari, seems to be ranging anarchically all over the place, in fact it has a rigid and unvarying architecture, which is what keeps it from falling apart.") Of Learned Ignorance is a dead letter because it names a problem. It's a dead letter because it is, cautiously, a love letter. It's a dead letter because it lovingly stages an experiment in whimsy, and perhaps above all, because it is problematic (in the Kantian sense): It is a (sober) attempt at exemplifying what it talks about -- and what eludes it: A series of footnotes, with blank (transcriptive) pages above, effects something like the integration of a differential, the reciprocal determination where the sources enter into in relation to one another in order to produce a paper, essay, or (inexistent) (chap)book. Of Learned Ignorance, in facing down a problem, makes a wager; it courts failure; it puts it all on the line. All, yes, for love -- a kind of love ... (of wisdom?). 606 $aPhilosophy (General) 610 $aphilosophy 610 $aEmmanuel Kant 610 $aFranz Kafka 610 $aLouis Althusser 610 $aGilles Deleuze 610 $aFelix Guattari 615 0$aPhilosophy (General) 700 $aMunro$b M$g(Michael),$0984397 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910140448003321 996 $aOf Learned Ignorance: Idea of a Treatise in Philosophy$93083746 997 $aUNINA