LEADER 03157oam 2200553 450 001 9910140122303321 005 20230621141135.0 010 $a2-7226-0341-1 024 7 $a10.4000/books.cdf.3684 035 $a(CKB)2560000000352123 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001541700 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11876070 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001541700 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11535476 035 $a(PQKB)11365805 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00045272 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-cdf-3684 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/53291 035 $a(PPN)267931514 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000352123 100 $a20160829d2014 uy 0 101 0 $afre 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 13$aLa métaphysique et les sciences $eles nouveaux enjeux /$fClaudine Tiercelin 210 $cCollège de France$d2014 210 31$aFrance :$cCollège de France,$d2014 215 $a1 online resource (32 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aPhilosophie de la Connaissance 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 330 $aEven if "man does metaphysics as he breathes" (Meyerson), it has become almost natural to consider that it is for the sciences to tell us what the world is made of and hence what it is. Metaphysics, for its part, could not teach us anything about objective reality: at best it can inform us about certain necessary features of what we think about it. Also, to reflect on the relations between metaphysics and the sciences, is it certainly to evoke their tense links throughout history and therefore the validity, for both of them, of certain calls to order. . It is then to suggest, to avoid scientism and apriorism, a few simple rules of good conduct. Finally, it is betting, at least if we want to rule out an idealism which threatens scientists and metaphysicians alike, on the double possibility of scientific realism as such and of a scientific metaphysics capable of telling us, without having to envy the sciences. , which is true, of course, of what we think of reality, but also and above all of reality in itself (Lowe). These are the major issues that arise today not only for the philosopher and the historian of science and the metaphysician (in the traditional sense that we are used to giving these terms in France), but to the philosopher as such, to which, incidentally, certain crucial problems relating to language, knowledge or even ethics should never appear, in the more or less long term, as absolutely foreign. 606 $aPhilosophy$2HILCC 606 $aPhilosophy & Religion$2HILCC 606 $aSpeculative Philosophy$2HILCC 610 $asciences 610 $amétaphysique 610 $aréalisme 615 7$aPhilosophy 615 7$aPhilosophy & Religion 615 7$aSpeculative Philosophy 700 $aTiercelin$b Claudine$0802319 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910140122303321 996 $aLa métaphysique et les sciences$92137328 997 $aUNINA