LEADER 02355nam  2200565 a 450 
001 9910139235803321
005 20230803023550.0
010   $a1-118-39730-4
010   $a1-299-24170-0
010   $a1-118-39715-0
035   $a(CKB)2560000000098537
035   $a(EBL)1134692
035   $a(OCoLC)830166801
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000852563
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11499856
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000852563
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10853851
035   $a(PQKB)10462631
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1134692
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1134692
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10667394
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL455420
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000098537
100   $a20130214d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aAquinas on the Supreme Court$b[electronic resource] $erace, gender, and the failure of natural law in Thomas's biblical commentaries /$fEugene F. Rogers Jr
210   $aHoboken $cWiley$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (338 p.)
225  0$aChallenges in contemporary theology
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-118-39116-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $apt. I. Aquinas on the failure of natural law -- pt. II. Aquinas on the redemption of natural law.
330   $aThis new work clarifies Aquinas' concept of natural law through his biblical commentaries, and explores its applications to U.S. constitutional law. The first time the use of Aquinas on the U.S. Supreme Court has been explored in depth, and its applications tested through a rigorous reading of the biblical commentariesShows how key judgments in the Supreme Court have rested on medieval natural law, and applies critical gender theory to discuss problems with these applicationsOffers new research data to give a different picture of Aquinas and natural law, and a f
410  0$aChallenges in Contemporary Theology
606   $aNatural law
615  0$aNatural law.
676   $a189/.4
700   $aRogers$b Eugene F.$cJr.$0982270
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910139235803321
996   $aAquinas on the Supreme Court$92242018
997   $aUNINA