LEADER 03287 am 22006853u 450 001 9910137512003321 005 20221206181209.0 010 $a9780620687379 (ebook) 035 $a(CKB)3710000000575701 035 $a(OCoLC)945783464 035 $a(ScCtBLL)6fb40097-4523-44b0-8825-c09574ec0268 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34386 035 $a(NjHacI)993710000000575701 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000575701 100 $a20160201h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn#nnn||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aJudging Q and saving Jesus $eQ?s contribution to the wisdom-apocalypticism debate in historical Jesus studies /$fLlewellyn Howes 210 $aSouth Africa$cAOSIS$d2015 210 1$aDurbanville, South Africa :$cAOSIS,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (xix, 342 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aOpen Access e-Books 225 0 $aKnowledge Unlatched 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 304-336) and index. 327 $aChapter 1. A focused overview of the quest for Jesus -- Chapter 2. Q as document -- Chapter 3. Eschatological judgment and the Son of Man -- Chapter 4. 'Do not judge!' in Q 6:37-38 -- Chapter 5. The Sayings Gospel Q and the historical Jesus. 330 $aThe monograph Judging Q and Saving Jesus is characterised by careful textual analysis, showing a piercing critical eye in its impressive engagement with the secondary literature, and sharp and insightful critique. The target audience are specialists in the field of research on the Sayings Source Q (the hypothetical source of certain sayings of Jesus common to Matthew and Luke), historical Jesus, and early Christian theology. The book takes the stance that the hypothetical document Q can be reconstructed with sufficient precision and that this enables biblical scholars to study with confidence its genre and its thematic and ideological profile. The genre issue is central to the book overall structure and the alternative proposals are discussed at length and with sophistication. The author?s inference is that Q?s macrogenre is sapiential with occasional insertions of apocalyptic microstructures and motifs. This finding embodies progress in Historical Jesus studies. 606 $aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) 610 $aTheology 610 $aapocalyptic 610 $ado not judge 610 $adocumentary status 610 $aeschatological 610 $ahistorical jesus 610 $ajudgment 610 $ajudgement 610 $anew testament 610 $aapokaliptiese 610 $amoenie oordeel 610 $aeskatologiese 610 $ahistoriese jesus 610 $aoordeel 610 $anew quest 610 $aold quest 610 $apsychostasia 610 $aLogia 610 $aSon of man 610 $aWisdom literature 615 0$aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) 676 $a226.066 700 $aHowes$b Llewellyn$0916707 801 0$bAuAdUSA 801 1$bAuAdUSA 801 2$bUkMaJRU 912 $a9910137512003321 996 $aJudging Q and saving Jesus$92055145 997 $aUNINA