LEADER 03397nam 22005295 450 001 9910137184503321 005 20230125195240.0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-1-137-59261-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000000534384 035 $a(DE-He213)978-1-137-59261-3 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00058199 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5637451 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5637451 035 $a(OCoLC)960756115 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43000 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000534384 100 $a20160215d2015 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security $eChapter 1 from Absence in Science, Security and Policy /$fby Brian Rappert 205 $a1st ed. 2015. 210 $cPalgrave Macmillan$d2015 210 1$aLondon :$cPalgrave Macmillan UK :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (33 pages) 311 $a1-137-59261-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover -- Title page -- Sensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security -- The interweavings of presence and absence -- Inquiry and absence -- The interweavings of concern and nonconcern -- Inquiry and concern -- Sensitivities -- Notes. 330 $aChapter 1 of this book is open access under a CC BY license. This is a chapter from Absence in Science, Security and Policy edited by Brian Rappert and Brian Balmer. This chapter is available open access under a CC BY license. Part reflection on the forthcoming chapters, part analysis of academic literature, and part programmatic agenda setting, this introduction chapter forwards the importance of questioning taken for granted assumptions in sensing what is absent as a concern. It undertakes this through initially examining what it means to characterize concern as absent or present in the first place. While absence and presence are often treated as binary opposites, it will be argued this distinction is difficult to sustain and unhelp for analysis. On the back of an appreciation of the inter-relation of absence and presence, this chapter then reviews the literature in sociology, ethics, STS and elsewhere relevant to the themes of the volume. A goal is to outline the methodological and epistemological possibilities and problematics of studying what is missing. By way of then proposing what is required, and to set the stage for the other chapters in Part 1, this chapter ends by asking how autostereograms provide a metaphor for viewing that can guide the study of absence. 606 $aSocial sciences?Philosophy 606 $aSocial Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E43000 610 $ascience 610 $aphilosophy 610 $apolicy 615 0$aSocial sciences?Philosophy. 615 14$aSocial Philosophy. 676 $a500 700 $aRappert$b Brian$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0801624 801 0$bWaSeSS 801 1$bWaSeSS 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910137184503321 996 $aSensing Absence: How to See What Isn't There in the Study of Science and Security$91921211 997 $aUNINA