LEADER 05728nam 2200601 450 001 9910136817503321 005 20221206103905.0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000631043 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40700 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000631043 100 $a20160411d2015uuuu fy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurc|#---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aAlternative models of addiction$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by Hanna Pickard, Serge H. Ahmed and Bennett Foddy 210 $cFrontiers Media SA$d2015 210 1$a[Lausanne, Switzerland] :$cFrontiers Media SA,$d2015 215 $a1 online resource (173 pages) $cillustrations; digital, PDF file(s) 225 0 $aFrontiers research topics 225 1 $aFrontiers in psychiatry,$x1664-8714 311 $a2-88919-713-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $tAlternative models of addiction /$rHanna Pickard, Serge H. Ahmed and Bennett Foddy --$tAddiction and choice: theory and new data /$rGene M. Heyman --$tIntertemporal bargaining in addiction /$rGeorge Ainslie --$tAddiction and the brain-disease fallacy /$rSally Satel and Scott O. Lilienfeld --$tThe addict in us all /$rBrendan Dill and Richard Holton --$tAddiction: choice or compulsion? /$rEdmund Henden, Hans Olav Melberg and Ole Jørgen Røgeberg --$tExplaining human recreational use of 'pesticides': the neurotoxin regulation model of substance use vs. the hijack model and implications for age and sex differences in drug consumption /$rEdward H. Hagen, Casey J. Roulette and Roger J. Sullivan --$tAddiction is not a brain disease (and it matters) /$rNeil Levy --$tAddiction, the concept of disorder, and pathways to harm: comment on Levy /$rJerome C. Wakefield --$tHow many people have alcohol use disorders? Using the harmful dysfunction analysis to reconcile prevalence estimates in two community surveys /$rJerome C. Wakefield and Mark F. Schmitz --$tCorrigendum: how many people have alcohol use disorders? Using the harmful dysfunction analysis to rectify prevalence rates in two community surveys /$rJerome C. Wakefield and Mark F. Schmitz --$tAddiction is not a natural kind /$rJeremy Michael Pober --$tThe puzzling unidimensionality of DSM-5 substance use disorder disgnoses /$rRobert J. MacCoun --$tThe puzzling unidimensionality of DSM substance use disorders: commentary /$rChristopher Stephen Martin --$tPleasure and addiction /$rJeanette Kennett, Steve Matthews and Anke Snoek --$tThe shame of addiction /$rOwen Flanagan --$tDyadic social interaction as an alternative reward to cocaine /$rGerald Zernig, Kai K. Kummer and Janine M. Prast --$tIs "loss of control" always a consequence of addiction? /$rMark D. Griffiths --$tDisentangling the correlates of drug use in a clinic and community sample: a regression analysis of the associations between drug use, years-of-school, impulsivity, IQ, working memory, and psychiatric symptoms /$rGene M. Heyman, Brian J. Dunn and Jason Mignone. 330 3 $aFor much of the 20th century, theories of addictive behaviour and motivation were polarized between two models. The first model viewed addiction as a moral failure for which addicts are rightly held responsible and judged accordingly. The second model, in contrast, viewed addiction as a specific brain disease caused by neurobiological adaptations occurring in response to chronic drug or alcohol use, and over which addicts have no choice or control. As our capacity to observe neurobiological phenomena improved, the second model became scientific orthodoxy, increasingly dominating addiction research and informing public understandings of addiction. More recently, however, a dissenting view has emerged within addiction research, based partly on new scientific research and partly on progress in philosophical and psychological understandings of relevant mental phenomena. This view does not revert to treating addiction as a moral failure, but nonetheless holds that addictive behaviour is fundamentally motivated by choice and subject to at least a degree of voluntary control. On this alternative model of addiction, addictive behaviour is an instrumental means to ends that are desired by the individual, although much controversy exists with respect to the rationality or irrationality of these ends, the degree and nature of the voluntary control of addictive behaviour and motivation, the explanation of the difference between addictive and non-addictive behaviour and motivation, and, lastly, the extent to which addictive behaviour and motivation is correctly characterised as pathological or diseased. This research topic includes papers in the traditions of neuroscience, psychology, philosophy, law and social science that explore alternative understandings of addiction 410 0$aFrontiers in psychiatry,$x1664-8714. 606 $aPsychiatry 606 $aSubstance abuse 606 $aAddicts$xPsychology 606 $aCompulsive behavior 610 $acompulsion 610 $aAddiction 610 $aDisease 610 $adrugs 610 $aSelf-Control 610 $achoice 610 $asubstance abuse 610 $asubstance dependence 615 0$aPsychiatry. 615 0$aSubstance abuse. 615 0$aAddicts$xPsychology. 615 0$aCompulsive behavior. 676 $a616.86 700 $aBennett Foddy$4auth$01372032 702 $aPickard$b Hanna 702 $aAhmed$b Serge H. 702 $aFoddy$b Bennett 801 2$bUkMaJRU 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910136817503321 996 $aAlternative models of addiction$93401867 997 $aUNINA