LEADER 01574nam 2200349Ia 450 001 996389553203316 005 20200824131941.0 035 $a(CKB)1000000000640795 035 $a(EEBO)2240895399 035 $a(OCoLC)ocm11875376e 035 $a(OCoLC)11875376 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000640795 100 $a19850402d1690 uy | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurbn||||a|bb| 200 12$aA just reply to Mr. John Flavell's arguments by way of answer to a discourse lately published, entitled, A solemn call, &c$b[electronic resource] $ewherein it is further plainly proved that the covenant made with Israel on Mount Sinai, as also the covenant of circumcision made with Abraham, whereon so much stress is laid for the support of infants baptism ... : together with a reply to Mr. Joseph Whiston's reflections on the forementioned discourse, in a late small tract of his entituled, The right method for the proving of infants baptism ... /$fby Philip Cary .. 210 $aLondon $cPrinted for J. Harris ...$d1690 215 $a[8], 184 p 300 $aReproduction of original in the Union Theological Seminary Library. 330 $aeebo-0160 606 $aInfant baptism 615 0$aInfant baptism. 700 $aCary$b Philip$01016195 801 0$bEAE 801 1$bEAE 801 2$bm/c 801 2$bUMI 801 2$bWaOLN 906 $aBOOK 912 $a996389553203316 996 $aA just reply to Mr. John Flavell's arguments by way of answer to a discourse lately published, entitled, A solemn call, &c$92422167 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04854nam 22006015 450 001 9910136614103321 005 20230704132423.0 010 $a9783319449296 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-44929-6 035 $a(CKB)3710000000902967 035 $a(EBL)4716213 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-44929-6 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4716213 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000902967 100 $a20161011d2016 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNormative and Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Counseling $eNegotiating Genetics and Ethics /$fby Joseph B. Fanning 205 $a1st ed. 2016. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (157 p.) 225 1 $aPhilosophy and Medicine,$x2215-0080 ;$v124 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-319-44928-1 311 $a3-319-44929-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aLIST OF TABLES -- INTRODUCTION -- Methodology and Terminology -- Debbie?s Case -- Mapping the Project -- Chapters; I. GENETIC COUNSELING: MODELS AND VISIONS -- Teaching and Psychotherapeutic Models of Genetic Counseling -- Spiritualist Tradition -- A Technical Vision of Communication -- Theses of the Technical Vision -- The Technical Vision and the Teaching Model of Genetic Counseling -- Evaluation -- A Therapeutic Vision of Communication -- Theses of the Therapeutic Vision -- The Therapeutic Vision and Psychotherapeutic Model of Genetic Counseling -- Evaluation -- Summary -- II. A RESPONSIBILITY MODEL OF GENETIC COUNSELING -- Responsibility Model -- Embodiment Tradition of Communication -- A Pragmatic Theory of Communication -- What is communication? -- What is meaning? -- Underwriting the Responsibility Model -- Summary -- III. GENETIC COUNSELING AND NONDIRECTIVENESS -- A Brief History of Nondirectiveness -- Nondirectiveness and the Teaching Model -- Nondirectiveness and the -- Psychotherapeutic Model -- Nondirectiveness and the Responsibility Model -- Evaluation of Models: Debbie?s Case -- Summary -- IV. GENETIC COUNSELING AND SPIRITUAL ASSESSMENT -- Spiritual Assessment in Genetic Counseling -- Defining Spirituality -- Initial Motivations for Spiritual Assessment -- Explorations of Spiritual Assessment in Genetic Counseling -- HOPE Approach -- CEGRM -- Evaluation of Harms and Benefits -- Spiritual Assessment and Debbie?s Case -- Teaching Model -- Psychotherapeutic Model -- Responsibility Model -- Summary -- CONCLUSION -- Implications -- Genetic Counseling and Professional Communication -- Medicine and Spirituality -- APPENDIX -- BIBLIOGRAPHY. . 330 $aThis book provides an elaboration and evaluation of the dominant conceptions of genetic counseling as they are accounted for in three different models: the teaching model; the psychotherapeutic model; and the responsibility model. The elaboration of these models involves an identification of the larger traditions, visions and theories of communication that underwrite them; the evaluation entails an assessment of each model?s theses and ultimately a comparison of their adequacy in response to two important concerns in genetic counseling: the contested values of non-directiveness and the recognition of differences across perspectives, with special focus on how religious and spiritual beliefs of patients are coordinated with the networks of meaning in genetics. Several insights are made explicit in this project through the work of Robert Brandom. Brandom?s deontic scorekeeping model demonstrates how dialogue is at the root of grasping a conceptual content. Against this backdrop, professional communications such as genetic counseling can be seen as late developments in linguistic practices that have structural challenges. Brandom?s model reminds us that the professional needs the client?s understanding to grasp conceptual content in a particular context. . 410 0$aPhilosophy and Medicine,$x2215-0080 ;$v124 606 $aBioethics 606 $aCommunication 606 $aMedical genetics 606 $aBioethics 606 $aMedia and Communication 606 $aMedical Genetics 615 0$aBioethics. 615 0$aCommunication. 615 0$aMedical genetics. 615 14$aBioethics. 615 24$aMedia and Communication. 615 24$aMedical Genetics. 676 $a362.196042 700 $aFanning$b Joseph B$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0954147 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910136614103321 996 $aNormative and Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Counseling$92528160 997 $aUNINA