LEADER 05480nam 22006252 450 001 9910136612903321 005 20170201170828.0 010 $a1-316-77176-8 010 $a1-316-81092-5 010 $a1-316-81101-8 010 $a1-108-46512-9 010 $a1-139-85594-8 010 $a1-316-81110-7 010 $a1-316-81146-8 010 $a1-316-81119-0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000894276 035 $a(EBL)4697952 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4697952 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139855945 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000894276 100 $a20121106d2016|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCulpable carelessness $erecklessness and negligence in the criminal law /$fFindlay Stark$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017). 311 $a1-107-03890-1 311 $a1-316-81137-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Half-title ; Title page ; Copyright information; Dedication ; Table of contents ; Acknowledgements ; List of Abbreviations ; Table of Cases ; Table of Legislation ; 1 Introduction ; An Overview of the Argument ; Risks and Wrongdoing ; Why Is Justification Required? 327 $aJustifying Risk-taking 2 The Doctrinal Trend towards the Standard Account ; England and Wales ; Negligence ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Canada ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Australia ; The Common Law Jurisdictions ; The Older Codes ; The Modern Codes 327 $aVoluntary Intoxication in the Codified Jurisdictions Summary ; The United States ; The MPC's Definitions ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's Definitions ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's Definitions with Different Labels ; Adoption of the MPC's Definitions, with Edits 327 $aPartial Adoption of the MPC's Definitions Non-adoption of the MPC's Definitions ; No General Definitions ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; New Zealand ; Summary ; Scotland ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Conclusion ; 3 Consistency in Definition 327 $aDefending Multiple Definitions An Alternative Approach ; Duff on Communication ; The Boundaries of Definition ; Robinson on Conduct and Adjudication ; 'Thin Ice' and Discretion ; Practical Concerns ; A Criminalisation Concern ; An Over-inclusiveness Concern ; Conclusion 327 $a4 From Awareness to Belief 330 $aThe question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law. 606 $aNegligence, Criminal 606 $aCriminal intent 606 $aCriminal law 615 0$aNegligence, Criminal. 615 0$aCriminal intent. 615 0$aCriminal law. 676 $a345/.04 686 $aLAW026000$2bisacsh 700 $aStark$b Findlay$0850774 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910136612903321 996 $aCulpable carelessness$91899641 997 $aUNINA