LEADER 03953nam 22006492 450 001 9910136594303321 005 20161130110614.0 010 $a1-316-80049-0 010 $a1-316-80560-3 010 $a1-316-80487-9 010 $a1-316-62634-2 010 $a1-316-79559-4 010 $a1-316-80633-2 010 $a1-316-80925-0 010 $a1-316-80706-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000000894319 035 $a(EBL)4697951 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4697951 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781316795590 035 $a(PPN)199803315 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000894319 100 $a20160328d2016|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aWhen solidarity works $elabor-civic networks and welfare states in the market reform era /$fCheol-Sung Lee$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aNew York :$cCambridge University Press,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (xxii, 414 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aStructural analysis in the social sciences ;$v41 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 28 Nov 2016). 311 $a1-107-17404-X 311 $a1-316-80852-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- Revisiting the theories of welfare states in developing countries -- Theoretical discussion: the structures of associational networks and labor politics -- The origin of top-down solidarity in South Korea -- Embeddedness, cohesiveness, and the politics of social policy expansion in South Korea: universal vs. selective reforms -- The survival and decline of embeddedness under retrenchment drives: the politics of retrenchment under market reforms -- Comparative case studies I: market-oriented reforms of welfare states and union responses in Argentina and Brazil -- Comparative case studies II: market-oriented reforms of welfare states and union responses in South Korea and Taiwan -- Comparative case studies III: associational networks and welfare states in Argentina, Brazil, South Korea and Taiwan -- Conclusion. 330 $aWhy do some labor movements successfully defend the welfare state even under the pressures of neo-liberal market reform? Why do some unions (and their allied parties and civic associations) succeed in building more universal and comprehensive social policy regimes, while others fail to do so? In this innovative work, Cheol-Sung Lee explores these conundrums through a comparative historical analysis of four countries: Argentina, Brazil, South Korea and Taiwan. He introduces the notion of 'embedded cohesiveness' in order to develop an explanatory model in which labor-civic solidarity and union-political party alliance jointly account for outcomes of welfare state retrenchment as well as welfare state expansion. Lee's exploration of the critical roles of civil society and social movement processes in shaping democratic governance and public policies make this ideal for academic researchers and graduate students in comparative politics, political sociology and network analysis. 410 0$aStructural analysis in the social sciences ;$v41. 606 $aLabor movement$zDeveloping countries 606 $aLabor unions$xPolitical activity$zDeveloping countries 606 $aSocial movements$zDeveloping countries 606 $aSolidarity$zDeveloping countries 606 $aWelfare state$zDeveloping countries 607 $aDeveloping countries$xSocial policy 615 0$aLabor movement 615 0$aLabor unions$xPolitical activity 615 0$aSocial movements 615 0$aSolidarity 615 0$aWelfare state 676 $a330.12/6 700 $aLee$b Cheol-Sung$01074799 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910136594303321 996 $aWhen solidarity works$92581884 997 $aUNINA