LEADER 01892nas  2200589-a 450 
001 996221349203316
005 20230330001733.0
011   $a2044-9887
035   $a(CKB)3270000000000030
035   $a(CONSER)--2006205936
035   $a(DE-599)ZDB2592493 X
035   $a(EXLCZ)993270000000000030
100   $a20060417a20009999  ---            a
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aArbitration law reports and review$b[electronic resource]
210   $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2005-
215   $a1 online resource
311 08$aPrint version: Arbitration law reports and review. 2044-8651 (DLC)  2006205936 (OCoLC)66899818 
606   $aArbitration and award$zEngland$vPeriodicals
606   $aArbitration and award$zWales$vPeriodicals
606   $aArbitration and award$zEngland$vCases
606   $aArbitration and award$zWales$vCases
606   $aArbitrage$2eclas
606   $aJurisprudence$2eclas
606   $aAnnuaires$2eclas
606   $aArbitration and award$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst00812768
607   $aRoyaume-Uni$2eclas
607   $aEngland$2fast
607   $aWales$2fast
608   $aperiodicals.$2aat
608   $aPeriodicals.$2fast
608   $aTrials, litigation, etc.$2fast
608   $aPeriodicals.$2lcgft
608   $aPériodiques.$2rvmgf
615  0$aArbitration and award
615  0$aArbitration and award
615  0$aArbitration and award
615  0$aArbitration and award
615  7$aArbitrage.
615  7$aJurisprudence.
615  7$aAnnuaires.
615  7$aArbitration and award.
676   $a347.4209
906   $aJOURNAL
912   $a996221349203316
920   $aexl_impl conversion
996   $aArbitration law reports and review$92373260
997   $aUNISA

LEADER 02540 am  22005653u 450 
001 9910136403203321
005 20230621135320.0
010   $a3-946234-04-6
035   $a(CKB)3710000000601051
035   $a(OCoLC)945783708
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/27605
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000601051
100   $a20170206h20162016  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurmn#nnn|||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 04$aThe empirical base of linguistics $egrammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology /$fCarson T. Schu?tze
210   $cLanguage Science Press$d2016
210  1$aBerlin, Germany :$cLanguage Science Press,$d2016.
210  4$d©2016
215   $a1 online resource (xx, 244 pages) $cillustrations
225 0 $aOpen Access e-Books
225 0 $aKnowledge Unlatched
225 1 $aClassics in linguistics ;$v3
311   $a3-946234-03-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [209]-228) and indexes.
327   $a1: Introduction -- 2: Definitions and Historical Background -- 3: Judging Grammaticality -- 4: Subject-Related Factors in Grammaticality Judgments -- 5: Task-Related Factors in Grammaticality Judgments -- 6: Theoretical and Methodological Implications -- 7: Looking Back and Looking Ahead .
330   $aThroughout much of the history of linguistics, grammaticality judgments ? intuitions about the well-formedness of sentences ? have constituted most of the empirical base against which theoretical hypothesis have been tested. Although such judgments often rest on subtle intuitions, there is no systematic methodology for eliciting them, and their apparent instability and unreliability have led many to conclude that they should be abandoned as a source of data.
410  0$aClassics in linguistics (Berlin, Germany) ;$v3.
606   $aGrammaticality (Linguistics)
606   $aLinguistics$xMethodology
610   $alinguistic methodology
610   $agrammaticality judgements
610   $aintuition
610   $aNoam Chomsky
610   $aParsing
610   $aSyntax
615  0$aGrammaticality (Linguistics)
615  0$aLinguistics$xMethodology
676   $a415
700   $aSchu?tze$b Carson T.$0599571
801  0$bAuAdUSA
801  1$bAuAdUSA
801  2$bUkMaJRU
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910136403203321
996   $aThe empirical base of linguistics$92144737
997   $aUNINA