LEADER 03778oam 2200493 c 450 001 9910136248803321 005 20220221094418.0 010 $a3-8474-1078-4 010 $a3-8474-0910-7 024 3 $a9783847409106 035 $a(CKB)3710000000915683 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4721168 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4742575 035 $a(Verlag Barbara Budrich)9783847409106 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000915683 100 $a20220221d2016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Politics of Parliamentary Procedure $eThe Formation of the Westminster Procedure as a Parliamentary Ideal Type /$fKari Palonen 205 $a2nd ed. 210 $aLeverkusen$cVerlag Barbara Budrich$d2016 215 $a1 online resource (276 pages) 311 $a3-8474-0787-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aCurrently, parliament as a political institution does not enjoy the best reputation. This book aims to recover less known political resources of the parliamentary mode of proceeding. The parliamentary procedure relies on regulating debates in a fair way and on constructing opposed perspectives on the agenda items. The British House of Commons provides the closest historical approximation for the parliamentary ideal type of politics. This book deals with the formation and conceptual change in the Westminster procedure, based on the way they are interpreted in the tracts on procedure. The tracts illustrate the changing parliamentary self-understanding from the 1570s to the present and the growing political role of procedural disputes. The parliamentary style of politics, as discussed in the tracts, can be divided into two genres: the politics of agenda-setting and the politics of debate. The book analyses their formation and overall conceptual change as well as the procedural responses to the increasingly scarce parliamentary time from the period after the 1832 parliamentary reform. It insists that in spite of claims on urgency and on government's leadership the procedural resources of the House of Commons contribute to maintaining the debate-centred parliamentary style of politics. 330 1 $aThe book is of interest for anyone trying to gain an understanding of Parliamentary procedure, as it contemporises procedure as opposed to historical procedure, and it will be useful for those British scholars who are interested in the changing  procedure of Westminster. Political Studies Review 05/2016 Palonen paints a very useful picture of the procedural evolution of Parliament, helping us to understand the roots of the procedural politics which Members of Parliament still play in the House today. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 18.02.2016 Das Buch la?dt dazu ein, angebliche parlamentarische Gesetzma?ßigkeiten kritisch zu hinterfragen. Eine weitere Sta?rke des Sammelbandes liegt in der internationalen Ausrichtung der Beitra?ge - die Autor_innen stammen aus acht La?ndern. Da sie auf verschiedenen Ebenen argumentieren, ist es lobenswert, dass die Herausgeber die Artikel in einer Einleitung und einem Epilog zueinander in Beziehung setzen. Portal fu?r Politikwissenschaft, Pw-portal.de, 30.07.2015 606 $aHouse of Commons 606 $aparliament 606 $aWestminster Procedure 615 4$aHouse of Commons 615 4$aparliament 615 4$aWestminster Procedure 676 $a328.4077 700 $aPalonen$b Kari$cProf. Dr.$4aut$0798754 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910136248803321 996 $aThe Politics of Parliamentary Procedure$92780927 997 $aUNINA